Federal Trade Commission Proposes Frontier Communications Reimburse LA and Riverside Counties $8.5 Million

Federal Trade Commission Proposes Frontier Communications Reimburse LA and Riverside Counties $8.5 Million
The sign on Frontier Communications office building in Middletown on July 8, 2016. Holly Kellum/The Epoch Times
City News Service
Updated:

LOS ANGELES—The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) wants Frontier Communications to pay $8.5 million in civil penalties and costs to Los Angeles and Riverside counties, plus $250,000 that will be distributed to the internet provider’s California customers, according to a proposed order filed Thursday in Los Angeles.

The move follows a 2021 lawsuit filed by the FTC and the district attorneys of Los Angeles and Riverside counties and attorneys general in several states, alleging that Frontier wasn’t delivering the speeds customers were paying for.

The proposed order must be signed by a Los Angeles federal judge before it takes effect.

A Frontier spokesperson said that the FTC’s complaint included “baseless allegations and disregarded important facts,” adding that the settlement stipulates “that we admit no wrongdoing.”

The company said that it settled the lawsuit in March “in good faith to put it behind us so we could focus on our business—that’s in the best interest of all our stakeholders, and especially our customers. Our commitment is to our customers and providing them with access to high-speed internet and improving our service in rural and underserved areas.”

The FTC contends that Frontier “did not provide many consumers with the maximum speeds they were promised, and the speeds they actually received often fell far short of what was touted in the plans they purchased.”

Frontier denied the claims, issuing a statement last year maintaining that the company’s DSL speeds have been “clearly and accurately articulated, defined and described” in its marketing materials and disclosures.

In the complaint, the FTC and its partners allege that Connecticut-based Frontier advertised and sold Internet service in several plans, or tiers, based on download speed. Frontier has touted the tiers using a variety of methods, including mail and online ads, and has sold them to consumers over the phone and online.

The FTC’s complaint was filed with attorneys general from Arizona, Indiana, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, as well as the district attorneys’ offices of Los Angeles County and Riverside County on behalf of the state of California.

“Consumers must receive the internet service they are paying for,” L.A. County District Attorney George Gascón said when the suit was filed. “We will not stand by while consumers fulfill their end of the contract and companies fail to fulfill theirs.”

Frontier provides digital subscriber line Internet service to about 1.3 million consumers, many in rural areas, across 25 states including California.

City News Service
City News Service
Author
Breaking news gathering service based in West Sacramento, California, USA Gathering and distributing breaking news content via video, photographic and audio
twitter
Related Topics