Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) is demanding answers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) after the agency refused to release all documents regarding how it intended to implement a 2021 executive order on expanding voter access. Republicans have opposed this order as an unlawful exercise of federal power over elections.
The executive order also mandates that these agencies work with “approved” third-party organizations to provide voter registration services on federal agency premises.
On Oct. 18, Norman, who sits on the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding to know why the DOJ has failed to properly respond to FGA’s FOIA request, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Epoch Times before its public release.
“The U.S. Constitution makes it clear that states must manage their own elections, without meddling by the federal government,” Norman told The Epoch Times in an email.
“We’re looking at a Department of Justice that appears to be overstepping that Constitutional boundary at the direction of President Biden, and then deliberately defying court orders. Add that to the list of problems we have with the DOJ.”
He was referring to a July district court ruling that ordered the DOJ to produce the documents under the FOIA request.
The federal government should “keep their hands out of our election process” and modify the voting policies so that it’s “easier for citizens to vote, and harder to cheat,” according to Norman.
“The DOJ’s reputation with public trust is already minimal at best. What could the DOJ have to gain from hiding their plan to promote voter participation from the public?” he wrote.
Legality Challenged
In his letter, Norman argued that Biden shouldn’t have issued such an order in the first place.“The President has no legal basis to order all federal agencies to engage in voter registration, nor does he have the authority to order any federal agency to engage in efforts to promote voter participation,” the letter reads. “Yet, that is precisely what he is seeking to do through this EO.”
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the president the authority to “transform all federal executive agencies led by his political appointees, including DOJ, into get-out-the-vote machines for the left, paid for by federal taxpayers,” according to the letter.
The FGA came to a similar legal conclusion. Aside from referencing the two U.S. laws, the group argued that Biden’s order “oversteps the limited federal agency involvement in voter registration allowed under the National Voter Registration Act.” As a result, the FGA concluded that the executive order “is illegal, unethical, and unconstitutional.”
Additionally, the FGA argued that the Biden administration is using the executive order to benefit Democratic candidates.
FGA
The FGA filed its FOIA request with the DOJ on July 30, 2021. After the DOJ failed to turn over a single document for more than 200 days, the group filed a lawsuit against the department in April. A federal district court ruled in favor of the FGA in July, ordering the DOJ to disclose all requested documents under the FOIA request before the Nov. 8 midterm elections.Norman rejected the DOJ’s claim, saying that the privileges cited shouldn’t “apply to this finished, post-decisional document.”
“Attempting to conceal this plan from the public is not only contrary to federal law, but is deeply concerning and damaging to the public’s already dwindling confidence in your department,” Norman wrote in the Oct. 18 letter.
The congressman asked the DOJ to disclose all documents by Oct. 30, given that the plan is already complete. It “would be a solid first step” for the DOJ to regain the trust of the American people, he wrote.