A diverse coalition of American organizations has signed a letter organized by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—the leading business lobbying organization in the United States—urging reforms to the infrastructure permitting process.
The letter touts potential benefits from a streamlined permitting process, such as more reliable energy production with reduced emissions; the ability to move people and goods more efficiently with improved highways, bridges, and transit systems; and the opportunity to strengthen U.S. national security by expanding the domestic sourcing of raw materials to build critical technologies.
“But America cannot accomplish any of this if the outdated, inefficient, and unpredictable permitting process is not improved,” the letter continues.
Fossil Fuel and Clean Energy Organizations Back Reforms
The letter was signed by several organizations involved in the fossil fuel industry, such as the American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute, American Petroleum Institute, American Public Gas Association, and the Independent Petroleum Association of America, among others. The letter was also signed by organizations promoting clean energy solutions, such as the Solar Energy Industries Association, the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, and the American Clean Power Association.The letter’s signatories also appear to cross party affiliations. The letter was signed by the left-leaning Progressive Policy Institute, Americans for Tax Reform, a politically conservative environmental conservation advocacy group called ConservAmerica, and the Bipartisan Policy Center.
“We are pleased to see support for modernizing our permitting process from across the ideological spectrum, and a recognition that the current system is broken,” the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Coalition letter reads. “We know there are differing perspectives in Congress on how best to address current challenges. Our organizations will not agree on every issue. We are committed, however, to working with Congress to find solutions and pass meaningful and durable legislation.”
The Permitting Reform Debate in Congress
While the Chamber of Commerce coalition letter touted its bipartisan and diverse industry appeal, lawmakers from both sides of the political aisle have opposed permitting reforms.Sens. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mitt Romney (R-Utah), and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) voted for Manchin’s bill language. Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) voted against the measure, as did Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
“This would gut bedrock environmental regulations and fast track fossil fuel projects. I refuse to allow our residents in frontline communities to continue to be sacrificed for the fossil fuel industry’s endless greed,” Tlaib tweeted.
NTD News reached out to Capito and Manchin’s offices for comment on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s coalition letter supporting permitting reform efforts. Neither office responded before this article was published.
NTD News also contacted the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, but the organization did not immediately respond.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said Scalise’s bill “would advance important policies to improve the permitting process, ensure strong domestic energy production, protect energy exports and increase production and processing of our own critical minerals.”