Democratic candidates debated their plans for the country in Detroit during the first round of debates on July 30, but amid the socialist policy plans, a few Democrats drew a line to distance themselves from the progressives.
The leading progressives, Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), were center-stage. Around them were eight other candidates, including John Delaney and Tim Ryan—both candidates that see no hope in winning the presidency with radical proposals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db407/db407648906358cf44149078b93976bf0050b3c9" alt="Democratic presidential candidates Marianne Williamson, (L-R), Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), former Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke, former Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper, former Maryland congressman John Delaney, and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock take the stage at the beginning of the Democratic Presidential Debate at the Fox Theatre in Detroit, Michigan on July 30, 2019. 20 Democratic presidential candidates were split into two groups of 10 to take part in the debate sponsored by CNN held over two nights at Detroit’s Fox Theatre. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)"
But according to Rich Valdes—political commentator, radio host, and associate director for the Mark Levin Show—this is expected.
“Traditionally you still have a lot of baby boomers out there that I think identify as the JFK Democrat,” said Valdes in an interview with The Epoch Times. “They feel disenfranchised by the Democratic Party, that with these debates, and with the rhetoric, and the ”Squad,“ and all of these things that are going on—[they] feel that they’ve been abandoned.”
To select a few, candidates proposed Medicare-for-all, a Wealth Tax, and the decriminalization of illegal border crossings. Under Sanders’s Medicare for All, taxpayers would cover the health insurance of illegal immigrants; Warren’s Wealth tax would have the wealthy pay handsomely for public services.
Candidates such as Delaney and Ryan, however, seem hopeful running as Democrats. And in response to the enthusiasm for these socialist policies, they took the little airtime they got to address what they called fiction, or the “impossible.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a23d5/a23d59fee1c08761aa0c4c6f0286b43332dcb91b" alt="Democratic presidential hopeful former US Representative for Maryland's 6th congressional district John Delaney at the Democratic Presidential debate in Detroit, Michigan, on July 30, 2019. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)"
“I think Democrats win when we run on real solutions—not impossible promises—when we work on things that are workable, not fairy tale economics,” said Delaney.
Little Interest for Radical Changes
Valdes said he does not think that Americans, for the most part, want what the progressives are offering: “They rejected it in 2016, and I think they'll likely reject it in 2020.”So why defend and push for socialism when the prospects are no good? Valdes said they are building their base.
“This is the first year that we'll have the [most] 18 to 39-year-old voters that we’ve ever had. I think this is why they are trying to push these ideas,” he said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92335/92335632e4a87a41ced2c3f51136bb51ffa18035" alt="Rich Valdes in an interview with NTD News at 77WABC, on June 17, 2019. (Shenghua Sung/NTD News)"
“Historically, we’ve seen these things before, accompanied by acts of force—like Lenin and Stalin, etc.—but the ideas are the same,” said Valdes. “These are communist-light ideas that they are trying to infuse in the American mainstream.”