The bill mostly makes it harder for shareholders to file lawsuits against deals conducted by controlling stockholders if they have a majority of votes.
“Certain acts or transactions involving such directors or officers will be protected if approved or recommended by a majority of the disinterested directors, either serving on a board of directors or a committee of the board of directors, or approved or ratified by a majority of the votes,” the bill text states.
The legislation passed after a major controversy involving a lawsuit filed by a Tesla shareholder against CEO Elon Musk.
Delaware is home to 2.2 million registered entities, which is over two times the total number of the state’s residents, said the statement from the governor’s office. Last year, the state incorporated 81 percent of all IPOs in the United States.
Moreover, corporate registrations bring in roughly $2.2 billion in annual revenues to the Delaware government, representing a third of the state budget.
Senate Bill 21 also includes measures such as establishing a “balanced framework for stockholder access to corporate books and records,” the governor’s office statement said.
The legislation “clarifies key governance structures to reinforce Delaware’s reputation for equitable, predictable, and efficient corporate oversight.”
Businesses incorporated in Delaware are facing an “increasingly litigious environment,” which imposes sizable financial and human resource costs, the filing said.
Shareholder Rights in Delaware
Multiple groups opposed Senate Bill 21. On March 18, several organizations, such as Americans for Financial Reform, Consumer Federation of America, and Public Citizen, sent a letter to lawmakers, warning against implementing the bill.The bill “would overhaul Delaware corporate law by severely undermining the ability of regular shareholders, like teachers and firefighters saving for retirement, to hold directors, officers, and controlling stockholders like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg accountable through the Delaware Courts when they overreach and extract value from companies incorporated in Delaware,” the letter said.
“About two-thirds of S&P 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware. This means the effects of SB 21 would reverberate across the country, increasing the power of self-dealing corporate actors and decreasing the power of regular shareholders to hold them accountable.”
The legislation will offer company managers a higher level of certainty when it comes to certain types of transactions, typically involving “controllers” of companies, the firm said.
“That added certainty, and the ability to have such issues heard before the Delaware Court of Chancery, the preeminent business court in the country, will serve to ensure Delaware’s continued stature in the field.”
Corporate clients of Delaware’s legal, professional, and financial services companies often lodge in DHLA member properties. “If a mass exodus of corporations were to occur, our members would lose thousands of customers and a perennial source of business,” it said.
“Such a significant loss of income could lead to staff cuts or even property closures, which would harm not only the hospitality industry but the entire Delaware economy.”