A federal court ruled that marking tires to enforce parking rules is like entering property without a warrant. The practice is now unconstitutional in four states.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the purpose of marking tires is to “raise revenue” and has nothing to do with a potential safety risk, Fox News reported.
Alison Taylor said she received more than 12 $15 tickets for going over the two-hour parking limit in Saginaw, Michigan. The city uses the practice of marking tires to keep track of how long a car is parked at the post.
The appeals court agreed with the claim.
“The city does not demonstrate, in law or logic, that the need to deter drivers from exceeding the time permitted for parking—before they have even done so—is sufficient to justify a warrantless search under the community caretaker rationale,” the court stated.
The court ruling applies to Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, which are covered by the 6th Circuit.
He argued that marking tires was similar to police secretly putting a GPS device on a vehicle without a proper warrant, which was the subject of a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
Taylor, on her Facebook page, said that law students would get to read about her case.
“That’s definitely the most exciting part!” she wrote, according to NPR. “I’ve helped change the law.”
The case will return to another federal court, as Ellison wants to certify the lawsuit as a class-action. That means it will make way for refunding people who got tickets, Fox reported.
He said Saginaw collects about $200,000 per year by issuing tickets via tire-chalking.