A legal battle will get underway in a federal appeals court on Tuesday. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is set to argue against a September order appointing an outside special master to review documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Such an appointment is, in effect, keeping those records out of investigators’ hands as they press ahead with a criminal probe against Trump.
But DOJ lawyers argued in the brief that the judge, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, issued “an unprecedented order … restricting an ongoing criminal investigation by prohibiting the Executive Branch from reviewing and using evidence” that was taken during the FBI search.
The Justice Department is investigating whether Trump violated any laws in relation to the removal of records from the White House and for possible obstruction of justice.
The special master is reviewing the seized materials to determine which, if any, were protected by attorney-client privilege or executive privilege.
But the Justice Department wants to cancel the special master review, which then would make the materials available to investigators probing Trump over the handling of the documents.
‘Horrendous Abuse of Power’
The DOJ has already managed to extract from the special master’s review those documents marked classified, but prosecutors are now trying to get access to all materials the FBI took when they raided Trump’s home.Days after Trump declared he’s running for president in 2024, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to lead the probe into the handling of documents seized at Mar-a-Lago.
Garland has called his decision to appoint a special counsel part of the DOJ’s “commitment to both independence and accountability in particularly sensitive matters.”
The White House has denied politicization of the Justice Department after Trump alleged that the appointment of the special counsel amounted to a “weaponization” of the DOJ and a ploy meant to impede his bid for the presidency.