Concerns Rise After Chinese Drone Maker Removes Security Features

A China-made DJI Mavic 2 Pro drone hovers in Miami on Dec. 15, 2021. Federal agents allege Yinpiao Zhou of China used a similar drone to fly over national security airspace above Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on Nov. 30, 2024. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Concerns about U.S. security are intensifying, experts say, in the wake of changes recently enacted by the world’s predominant drone company—based in China.

“The fact that these drones will now be allowed to be flown freely—without any sort of built-in restrictions—in the national airspace is absolutely a cause of concern,” Gabriel Garcia, technical director for SPS Aerial Remote Sensing, a Texas company specializing in counter-drone technology, told The Epoch Times.

For more than a decade, Da-Jiang Innovations, better known as DJI, had employed “geofencing” that automatically blocked operators from entering restricted airspace or “no-fly zones,” as declared by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Those zones, which include high-profile locations such as the White House, can also temporarily encompass scenes of natural disasters or large public gatherings.

But DJI, which holds a 90-percent share of the global drone market, eliminated the geofencing feature from most of its drones being used in the United States. The company took that action on Jan. 13, a week before President Donald Trump’s inauguration and shortly after mysterious drone sightings in several states.

DJI’s announcement triggered concerns from citizens and experts alike, not only because of the timing but also because of allegations that the company may have been funneling “U.S. critical infrastructure and law enforcement data to the Chinese government,” a 2017 U.S. Intelligence Bulletin said. Since then, Congress has taken several steps to counter the perceived threat, including prohibiting the Department of Defense (DOD) from using Chinese-made drones or drone parts.

The company has denied the allegations. DJI says that “critics have propagated a multi-year political campaign alleging security issues with DJI drones,” but independent audits and user testimonials left those claims unsupported.

DJI said it was removing the geofencing to align with “similar changes implemented in the European Union (EU) last year.”

As a result of the change, a DJI online app will notify users if they fly drones near FAA-designated “controlled airspace.” The company also said the decision puts control back into operators’ hands and underscores the principle that they bear “final responsibility” for drone use.

FAA Addresses Issues

When asked to comment on DJI’s decision and any concerns stemming from it, the FAA responded to The Epoch Times in more general terms, saying that the agency aims “to ensure drones operate safely within the National Airspace System.”

Further, “Drone operators must comply with FAA regulations including obtaining proper airspace authorization, when required. The FAA does not require geofencing from drone manufacturers,” the FAA said.

In addition, the FAA noted that it is generally legal to fly a drone “in most locations if you’re operating under 400 feet.” However, drone users must comply with rules, the agency said, “including passing pilot safety tests, keeping the drone in sight, avoiding all other aircraft, not causing a hazard to any people or property, and avoiding restricted airspace.”

The FAA Safety Team works to educate drone users, and “when violations occur, the FAA can take actions ranging from counseling and education to stiff fines and pilot certificate suspensions or revocations.”

DJI’s online announcement was detailed but did not address reasons for the timing of its geofencing removal. The company, which did not reply to The Epoch Times’ request for comment, is headquartered in Shenzhen. Founded in 2006, the company now has operations in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong.

Garcia noted that DJI had voluntarily imposed the geofencing requirements—unlike many other drone manufacturers; some do not require internet connectivity, which is what DJI used to impose the geofencing and will now use for the user “alerts” about nearing restricted airspace.

He also conceded that “anyone with YouTube access or a few dollars and a Google browser can figure out how to bypass those restrictions.”

Still, Garcia said that DJI’s removal of the geofencing was troubling. Returning control to operators might sound like a good idea, but many of them remain ill-informed about the ramifications of flying into restricted airspace, he said.

The company says it has been an industry leader in drone safety. DJI said it was the first drone company to implement Remote ID, geofencing, and other safety-focused features, including altitude limits, “return-to-home” technology for drones that lose connections or are low on battery power, and sensors to detect obstacles and approaching aircraft.

University of Maryland engineering students operate a DJI Inspire drone at a testing site for the university's Unmanned Aircraft Systems programs in Bushwood, Md., on June 24, 2016. At the time, the Federal Aviation Administration had unveiled new rules that cleared the way for commercial drones weighing less than 55 pounds to operate across the United States. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Action From FBI, Other Agencies?

But Robert Newcomb, a Utah-based weapons engineer and DOD contractor who works with drones, said America’s lack of counter-drone technology and coordination among U.S. agencies “opens up a real concern” over DJI’s geofencing removal.

“The FBI does not communicate well with other federal agencies like the FAA,” he told The Epoch Times. “The FBI should be having classified briefings with the FAA to help them understand the threat and make informed decisions about domestic regulation.”

The Epoch Times contacted the FBI for comment during the final days of President Joe Biden’s administration but received no reply.

Now that Trump is in office, Newcomb says he hopes that Trump’s pick for FBI director, Kash Patel, will enact the needed changes to improve U.S. counter-drone technology and tactics.

“There has to be reforms in the FBI that reflect better communication and collaboration with federal agencies like DOD and FAA,” he said.

Newcomb, a civilian, says he is “well-versed in applying technology to known classified threats in a theater of war.” But he said the FBI has previously rebuffed his efforts to alert the agency to suspected threats.

“They wouldn’t even interview me or make a report,” Newcomb said, despite several FBI visits during the past several years.

Hours after his inauguration, Trump addressed the recent spate of drone sightings. “I would like to find out what it is and tell the people,” he told reporters on Jan. 20 as he signed a flurry of executive actions. The newly inaugurated president also asked Susie Wiles, his chief of staff: “Why don’t we find out immediately?”

Trump also said he doubted that enemies of the United States were operating the drones; if that had been the case, he thinks American forces would have intercepted the aircraft and destroyed them. He suggested that U.S. officials “may have been testing something.” But if that were the case, “I don’t know why they wouldn’t have said what it was.”