A “true energy and minerals alliance” between the United States and Canada could feature a strategic minerals reserve that ensures competitive pricing for critical minerals, in a combined effort to free the global market from China’s manipulative domination, Canada’s chief energy official said on Feb. 4.
“Rather than going down a path that will inevitably be lose-lose, I am suggesting something entirely different,” Canadian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Jonathan Wilkinson said during a Feb. 4 discussion at the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Center in Washington.
“Such an alliance would enable [the] United States and Canada to achieve our shared vision for affordable energy bills for families, strong and secure economies, and North America as the world’s dominant energy supplier,” he said.
Wilkinson was in Washington for talks with administration officials, a day after U.S. President Donald Trump postponed levying a 25 percent tariff on Canadian imports for 30 days.
The Canadian energy chief said the neighboring nations are so economically tethered to each other that greater collaboration makes common sense, especially in the face of “the increasingly aggressive behavior of international actors like China.”
“[Tariffs] would cause financial pain for Canadian families, no doubt,” he said, adding that they would also inflict hardship on U.S. families and businesses.
“Americans would see higher prices when filling up their gas tanks and heating their homes,” Wilkinson said. “Groceries would become more expensive because Canadian potash that supplies American farmers would cost farmers more.”
He cited a Wells Fargo analysis that stated tariffs on Canada would add $2,000 to car price tags and “cost an average American family about $1,300 per year.”
Wilkinson said he wanted to focus on “the enormous economic opportunities that exist for cooperation between” the United States and Canada.
Strategic Minerals Reserve
Collaborative ventures could be particularly lucrative in energy and critical minerals development, he said.According to the United States Geological Survey’s 2022 List of Critical Minerals, China was the top producer of 29 of the world’s 50 “most critical” minerals. Among them are gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite. The Chinese regime in December restricted exports of these and other key minerals to the United States.
Wilkinson said Canada has “significant quantities” of germanium, zinc, nickel, copper, and graphite. He cited a longstanding joint investment germanium program between Canada and the U.S. Department of Defense as an example of a mutually beneficial opportunity.
“[It would] displace germanium the United States has been purchasing from China,” he said.
He said the United States and Canada could collaborate on rare earth processing to reduce their exposure to dependence on China. He noted that the one large rare earth mine that exists in the United States sends its product to China for processing because of a lack of processing technology in North America.
Because China dominates critical global markets, it can manipulate them to prevent other nations from competing, Wilkinson said.
“Whenever you are looking to start a project that requires hundreds of millions of dollars, all of a sudden the price goes down significantly, and the business case actually falls away,” he said. “We’ve seen that with lithium. We’ve seen it more recently with nickel, where China has used its dominance to flood the market.”
A Complete Nuclear Fuel Cycle
The nations can jointly develop uranium “to build a complete North American nuclear fuel cycle, which would mean relying less on Russia and enhancing continental security,” he said, noting that Canadian uranium already powers the equivalent of almost 20 million U.S. homes.“You need uranium from Canada,” Wilkinson said.
According to him, it would be a “perfect marriage,” since Canada “doesn’t really want to do enrichment because of non-proliferation kinds of issues.“ He said the two countries could work together to ensure they can ”enable the development and the deployment of these technologies as expeditiously as possible.”
He said there is also potential for negotiating how to “enhance the flow of Canadian crude from Alberta to assist the administration’s goal of energy dominance” and increase energy exports from the United States to the world.
Joint projects include enhancing the capacity of Canada’s Enbridge pipeline, which carries western Canadian crude oil to refineries in eastern Canada and the United States, he said.
As in the United States, Canada and its provincial governments are auditing regulations to streamline permitting, Wilkinson said.
According to him, Canada’s permitting process needs to take much less time than it does, and the country’s government is working on that.
“In the United States ... it’s even harder to get a mine permitted than it is in Canada,” he said.
Climate Concerns and Energy Security
A Liberal Party member of the Canadian Parliament’s House of Commons since 2015, Wilkinson has served in Cabinet positions since 2018, including that of environment and climate change minister, before being named energy chief by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2023.He was on the list of potential candidates to succeed Trudeau after the Canadian prime minister resigned last month but withdrew his name from the running.
A Rhodes Scholar, Wilkinson spent more than 20 years in the private sector, primarily with green energy companies, including Nexterra Systems, which develops “community scale gasification systems that convert non-recyclable organic waste into clean, renewable heat and power.”
Wilkinson said he got into politics “because of climate change.”
“So I am committed to ... fighting against climate change,” he said. “It’s a science issue. [It] shouldn’t be a partisan issue. But we need to do that in a manner that is thoughtful, that addresses concerns—legitimate concerns—people have, about affordability, and do so in a manner that actually ideally enhances our own energy security.”
Stopping the Flow of Fentanyl
A key motive behind the new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China is to stop the flow of fentanyl across the U.S. border. A White House fact sheet on the tariffs highlighted “the growing presence of Mexican cartels operating fentanyl and nitazene synthesis labs in Canada” and Canada’s “growing footprint within international narcotics distribution.”Wilkinson said the scale of illegal immigration and fentanyl seizures at the U.S.–Canada border is “not particularly significant.”
Canada represents just 0.2 percent of U.S. fentanyl border seizures, he said, noting that the amount of fentanyl seized at the U.S.–Canada border is “not a lot more than the seizures that go the other way. ”
Since Trump’s inauguration, Wilkinson said, Canada has announced “an enhanced border plan” to augment the $1.3 billion border plan it announced in December, which included funding for more helicopters, drones, canine teams, and mobile surveillance towers.
The additional measures will include the appointment of a Canadian “fentanyl czar,” the designation of cartels as terrorist organizations, and the launch of a “U.S.–Canada joint strike force” to combat organized crime.
Pathways for Collaboration
Canadians were caught off guard by the tariffs imposed by the United States, he said.“When all of a sudden Canada is treated more like an adversary than a partner, it did shake every Canadian, and I think you saw that in some of the patriotic expressions that came out in the aftermath of the decision to impose tariffs,” Wilkinson said.
“We need to hopefully walk back from the brink and find pathways through which we can actually work together.”
If not, Wilkinson said, U.S. citizens and Canadians will pay more for everything and continue to rely on China.
Wilkinson noted large U.S. purchases of uranium and potash from Russia and said the United States does not need to rely on these Russian imports.
“If we actually work together, you can be completely secure,” he said.
“Why are so many critical minerals being purchased from China? You don’t need to if we work together.”