A Climate Action Plan being debated in Chattanooga, Tennessee, was the subject of a public hearing in front of the city’s council on Tuesday, March 21, drawing a wide range of support and adamant opposition.
Tuesday’s meeting was of such interest that Chattanooga City Council Chairman Darrin Ledford said the building was over capacity per the fire marshal and those who couldn’t get a seat would need to leave the meeting room and wait in the lobby. The planned 30-minute speaking slot was also extended by an hour to allow more voices to be heard.
The plan, proposed by Mayor Tim Kelly, has ambitious goals for making governmental operations in the city carbon-neutral by 2040 and the entire Chattanooga community carbon-neutral by 2050.
The Plan
Over the years, the city has already cleaned up its image and environment decades after once being famously called “the dirtiest city in America” by Walter Cronkite in 1969.“While some folks may tune out or make assumptions about the plan based on its name alone—I’m here to tell you that it’s about a lot more than just climate resiliency,” he said in the video. “Chattanooga is growing and it’s up to us to ensure that we grow in a way that’s good for the environment, good for our local economy and good for our quality of life.”
Kelly goes on to say the plan is about sustainability and protecting the city from a “changing” climate that’s “causing more extreme weather events, disrupting local economies, negatively impacting public health and leading to billions of dollars in losses.”
The mayor notes the rise of “green technologies” and other cities working to “reduce their carbon footprints.”
The plan itself is broken down into “six ambitious yet achievable goals” through 2050.
They include building a more sustainable city through new, modernized smart growth and zoning policies; preserving and improving Chattanooga’s natural resources; becoming a national leader in the green economy; achieving net zero-carbon emissions and zero waste footprint in city government operations by 2040 and city-wide by 2050; and reducing disparities among socially and economically vulnerable communities.
Details of the plan’s equity portion include public water fountain/refill stations in key areas such as heat islands and unshaded streets; community health and resiliency assessments, and designing affordable housing developments with interconnected communities.
A Public Hearing
As residents of the city and surrounding Hamilton County voiced their opinions, the council called for order in the room more than once, as audience members reacted to speakers.A tally by The Epoch Times noted approximately 41 people voiced their opinion at the meeting, with around 22 in support and 19 against the plan.
Those who spoke ranged from everyday citizens to community leaders, business people, and representatives from major industries such as the local power company Electric Power Board (EPB) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).
Carol Eimers, TVA Regional Vice President, was the first speaker of the evening and voiced support from the TVA for the plan.
Glenda Pappu, a resident of Hamilton County, spoke against the plan, calling for a referendum for all county residents before the plan is implemented.
Rick Walser spoke against the plan just before his wife, Harriette Reid, also spoke against it. The couple said they moved to Chattanooga from California.
She spoke to how her former state of California’s climate efforts had worked out, in her opinion, stating windmills and solar panels did not keep up with power demand and there were rolling “brownouts,” along with wildfires caused in recent years due to lack of maintenance on power infrastructure.
“Does it rain more where minorities live,” she said. “Why are minorities more affected by climate change?”
Tanya Miller, a county resident, said the fact that several corporate and business leaders spoke in support of the plan was telling.
“I don’t want to call anybody out by names, but they’re all in support of this bill,” she said. “I’m against this plan and I think it needs to be put up to the citizens to have a vote on … We’re waking up more and more and learning more of what this plan is all about.”
She added she was concerned in particular about reliance on other countries for minerals used in electric vehicle batteries, such as China, along with fears of electricity prices going up as more people begin charging EVs.
Rachel Campbell, a city resident that said she owns a small subcontracting company, supported the plan and its goals of making Chattanooga clean compared to its “history of being the dirtiest city in the south.”
Aaron Berry, a man who said he was a retired Army Sgt. that lived in the city, said listening to speakers before him it was clear that “you have the corporation[s] against the people.”
He added he believed the plan was “surreal and serious” and “it’s a control factor.”
“I’ve been all over this world and I’ve seen it and now I’m sitting here in my own city. I didn’t come here to be in peace–to see war, and you know exactly what I’m talking about and I’m not going to go any further.”
Johan De Nysschen, a county resident and representative of the city’s transportation agency, said he was in favor of the plan and noted the impact he felt from hearing other speakers.
A slew of others spoke in favor and against the plan, echoing similar sentiments to those quoted.