California Senate Narrowly Approves Oil Regulation Bill in Special Session

The state’s Energy Commission could have the authority to order oil refiners to store more fuel. Critics say this could lead to price hikes.
California Senate Narrowly Approves Oil Regulation Bill in Special Session
Fuel is pumped into a vehicle at a gas station in Montebello, Calif., on May 15, 2024. Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images
Travis Gillmore
Updated:
0:00

California state senators approved a bill on Oct. 11 in a 23–9 vote that will give the California Energy Commission more authority to regulate oil refineries with the goal of lowering gasoline prices.

Assembly Bill X2-1, introduced by Assemblymembers Gregg Hart and Majority Leader Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, would allow the commission to order refiners to store more fuel and to coordinate and regulate refinery maintenance schedules.

The bill does not set minimum reserve levels or maintenance timeframes, but it gives the commission the authority to do so.

Supporters say the additional reserves will help mitigate price fluctuations due to limited supply.

“Rising gas prices impact everyone in California and nearly every facet of our lives—from how much we’re paying at the pump to the cost of what we’re buying at the store,” Senate President pro tem Mike McGuire said in an Oct. 11 press release. “Putting mechanisms in place to help prevent costs from spiking and sending family budgets into a tailspin benefits us all, and working together, we’ve been able to do just that.”

A joint author of the bill said price spikes of 50 to 75 cents per gallon have cost Californians approximately $2 billion annually.

“ABX2-1 should help stabilize gas prices and provide California motorists with some much-needed relief at the pump,” Sen. Nancy Skinner said in the statement.

During closing remarks before the Senate voted, Skinner called the bill an “important measure to protect California households.”

One Democratic colleague said the Legislature and regulators must monitor any impacts to ensure actions don’t have unintended consequences.

“All members of the Senate share concerns about the effect rising gas prices have on California families and the ripple effects that may have on the costs of other goods,” Sen. Steven Bradford, chair of the Senate Special Committee on Fuel Supply and Price Spikes, said in the press release. “As policymakers, we must be diligent in our oversight of the regulatory agencies to ensure that this legislation is implemented in a manner that protects the safety of the workers and makes gasoline more affordable for families. There is still much work to be done.”

Lawmakers are working after the legislative session ended Aug. 31 because Gov. Gavin Newsom called a special session to consider imposing supply mandates.
The governor applauded the Senate’s vote in an Oct. 11 press release.

“Californians are one step closer to getting the protections they need against Big Oil’s price spikes,” Newsom said. “I’m grateful to our partners in the Senate for helping to save Californians money at the pump.”

Californians pay a total of approximately $1.42 per gallon in state and federal taxes. The cost of gasoline in the Golden State is $4.67 per gallon compared to the national average of about $3.21 per gallon, according to the motoring club AAA.

Critics of the bill said the measure could cause gas prices to increase because refiners could be forced to limit supply to keep reserves at established limits.

Chevron executive Andy Walz sent a letter to the Legislature on Oct. 8, warning lawmakers the bill could achieve the opposite of its intended goal.

“California’s policy choices have led to a gasoline shortage by driving suppliers away,” Walz said. “We have a shortage of incentivizing policy for additional refiners and supply. California, stop making consumer conditions worse.”

Walz said the bill would increase supply shortages and cause a “permanent rise” in prices.

“Both risks extend beyond California, which should create the need for the legislature to proceed with caution, as policies that raise prices for the state could also affect neighbors in Arizona and Nevada,” Walz wrote.

The governors of both states recently wrote a joint letter to Newsom expressing similar concerns.

“With both of our states reliant on California pipelines for significant amounts of our fuel, these looming cost increases and supply shortages are of tremendous concern to Arizona and Nevada,” they wrote. “Further amplifying our concerns, refiners have raised the alarm that refinery inventory mandates could result in supply shortages and potential refinery shutdowns, which would have grave impacts to our shared economies and transportation infrastructure across the West.”

Others took exception to the scope of the powers the bill grants the Energy Commission, including the ability to impose fines from $100,000 to $1 million per day for noncompliance.

“This bill gives the [commission] a lot of power,” Republican Sen. Brian Dahle said during the floor session before the vote. “I don’t know how that is going to drive down the cost of oil and gas in California.”

He said the bill could have waited until the next legislative session.

“I can’t understand why we’re actually having a special session,” Dahle said. “This bill doesn’t do anything urgent.”

One Republican senator said her bill to suspend the gas tax for one year to help lower the price at the pump was not allowed a hearing.

“I’m deeply disappointed in the legislature’s decision to continue ignoring real solutions for lowering gas prices.” Sen. Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh said in a press release. “It is our legislative duty to support struggling families, and one critical step we can take is to provide immediate relief from the burdensome state excise tax.”

Other bills introduced in the Assembly that sought to remove fuels from the state’s cap-and-trade system, which is used to fine companies that exceed carbon emission limits and temporarily repeal the gas tax, among other things, also failed to advance.

Ochoa Bogh said Californians deserve help from legislators to find solutions that lower the cost of living.

“It is time we start delivering for the people we’re elected to serve,” Ochoa Bogh said.

Members of both political parties raised concerns during hearings for the bill about the impact the state’s clean air and other policies are having on the price of gas and energy.

A proposal up for a vote in November by the California Air Resources Board could raise the price of gas by 47 cents per gallon or more, according to the lawmakers.

The Assembly will next consider Senate amendments—including a cap on small refinery exemptions and protections for the health and safety of employees, local communities, and the public, among other things—on a date yet to be determined.

Travis Gillmore
Travis Gillmore
Author
Travis Gillmore is an avid reader and journalism connoisseur based in California covering finance, politics, the State Capitol, and breaking news for The Epoch Times.