U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on June 17 had a “candid” talk with Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang in Beijing, the two sides said, at the start of a two-day visit that has drawn criticism as experts and U.S. lawmakers say that visiting China was a mistake.
Blinken, the highest-level U.S. official to set foot in China since President Joe Biden took office in 2021, is the first secretary of state to visit since 2018, when his predecessor, Mike Pompeo, visited China for one day.
Qin greeted Blinken at Diaoyutai State Guest House in Beijing. The two chatted briefly and shook hands before heading into a meeting room. Neither of the diplomats made comments in front of reporters.
During their 5 1/2-hour meeting, Blinken “emphasized the importance of diplomacy and maintaining open channels of communication across the full range of issues to reduce the risk of misperception and miscalculation,” Matt Miller, spokesperson of the Department of the State, said in a readout released after the meeting.
“The Secretary raised a number of issues of concern,” Miller said without specifying.
Blinken invited Qin to visit Washington, and “they agreed to schedule a reciprocal visit at a mutually suitable time,” Miller said.
Both U.S. and China officials described their meetings as “candid” and “constructive” talks, though outside observers signaled low expectations for any major breakthroughs even ahead of their talks.
The trip won’t “produce any phased agreement, or specific results,” because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is set up such that all decisions ultimately come from Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Chen Lijian, a U.S.-based China commentator, told The Epoch Times on June 15.
Xi, meanwhile, has stepped up his efforts to prepare the party’s military wing and China’s population for conflict. On May 30, Xi told officials of the party’s national security commission that they “must be prepared for worst-case and extreme scenarios, and be ready to withstand the major test of high winds, choppy waters, and even dangerous storms.”
Washington, however, maintains robust ties with the democratic Taiwan under a framework set out in the Taiwan Relations Act, which obliges it to provide Taipei with the means to defend itself.
During Sunday’s meeting, Qin described Taiwan as “the core of China’s core interests,” “the most consequential issue,” and “the most prominent risk” in the U.S-China ties, according to the readout from Beijing’s foreign ministry.
“If the CCP completely falls out with the United States, or even heads to a conflict, almost all foreign investors would get out of the mainland, which is a situation that the CCP doesn’t want to see,” China affairs commentator Li Linyi said.
Chen also said that the Chinese regime can’t keep rising without the United States.
Blinken was set to have a working dinner with Qin on June 18 at the lavish complex in Beijing, followed by a meeting with China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi, on June 19.
Several Republican lawmakers have issued statements questioning why Blinken would choose to visit now.
“Instead of condemning the blatantly aggressive behaviors of the Chinese Communist Party, Secretary Blinken announced that he will legitimize the CCP’s continued subversion of our sovereignty with an upcoming official visit,” House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) said on June 16. “Secretary Blinken and the Biden Administration must immediately cease their weak and desperate pursuit of a ‘thaw’ in relations with the CCP.”
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said on June 17 that the Biden administration shouldn’t try to appease China, given the communist regime’s intentions against the United States.
“Xi Jinping has already made his priorities crystal clear: He wants to dominate the U.S., and a meeting will only give his party more ammunition to embarrass us on the world stage,” she said. “President Biden should instead focus on building a strong military that can compete with the CCP’s quest for global domination.”
Days before Blinken left for China, the State Department’s assistant secretary, Daniel Kritenbrink, told reporters, “We’re not going to Beijing with the intent of having some sort of breakthrough or transformation in the way that we deal with one another.
“This is not a visit in which I would anticipate a long list of deliverables coming out of it.”
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas) called on Blinken to impose sanctions on CCP officials.
‘Position of Weakness’
Alex Gray, a senior fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council and former chief of staff of the National Security Council, questioned why Blinken would want to meet with Chinese officials now, given China’s continued egregious behaviors, such as the Chinese spy balloon incident.“The reason I’m so concerned about that is President Biden and Secretary Blinken have continuously acted as if a meeting with Xi Jinping or with whoever the Chinese counterpart is, is the most important thing on their agenda.
“It doesn’t make sense to have the United States appearing to be begging for an audience with the General Secretary of the Communist Party [Xi].”
Gray said he thought the recent revelation of China’s base in Cuba would scuttle talks between the two countries. The fact that it didn’t is important, he added.
“I think, the reality is, the Biden administration is subordinate to the climate change lobby in the Democratic Party, who view Beijing not from a strategic or a military or an economic lens, but from a climate change lens,” Gray said.
As for Gates’s visit to China, Gray said the software giant hasn’t “realized that trying to operate in the national security realm in the United States, while operating in the economic realm in China, are not compatible.”
Intellectual Property Theft
There is an expectation that Blinken’s visit will pave the way for more bilateral meetings in coming months, including possible trips by U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. It also could set the stage for meetings between Xi and Biden at multilateral summits later in the year.China’s continued engagement in IP theft is one of the reasons for the rift between the two nations, according to Rocafort.
“When we talk about IP theft, we are talking about a variety of actions by the Chinese authorities,” he said. “We’re talking about companies of all sizes being targeted. We hear most often about the larger companies, about the juicier cases where there’s cutting-edge technology that’s being stolen. But it can also affect much, much smaller companies.”
“It’s also important to keep in mind that not all theft, so to speak, will take place at the hands of a state actor, although there’s certainly some of that going on,” Rocafort added.
“Sometimes what happens is that the inaction of the government or the environment created by the authorities can create an environment where private actors can then go out and take the IP of American and other foreign companies.”