Republican and Democrat lawmakers are seeking to block the Department of Education’s (DOE) move to cease funding for school archery and hunting programs under the guise of implementing the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA), passed last year.
The BSCA, passed in the aftermath of a few high profile shootings across the country, amended a section of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to prohibit federal funds from being used to train school staff in using dangerous weapons.
“The Department’s interpretation has sparked concerns from district and state leaders that ESEA funds may no longer be used to support archery, hunter safety education, or other extracurricular programs.”
The DOE has asked local and state education agencies to seek alternate funding sources for archery and hunting programs, the letter stated.
“This is concerning because of the important role these enrichment programs can play in students’ lives. Archery is an inclusive extracurricular activity that empowers students from all backgrounds to learn a sport and compete,” it said.
“Hunter safety classes and programs play an important role in teaching safety, wildlife management, landowner relations, and personal responsibility to students.”
More than 600,000 students are trained in hunter safety courses, with research showing that hunting-related injuries have dropped “significantly” over the past five decades due to higher participation in such programs, it said.
Lawmakers asked the DOE to interpret the language of the BSCA “as Congress intended” and “no longer ask educational entities to seek other funding sources for educational enrichment programs that align with the intent of ESEA.”
The BSCA was “carefully negotiated and drafted to protect and preserve law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights,” they said.
The letter was signed by 18 U.S. senators, including Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
Protecting Second Amendment Rights
In a statement to Fox News, Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.) criticized the Biden administration for advancing its “radical anti-Second Amendment agenda by prohibiting ESEA funding for archery and shooting sports programs.”“Upstate New York schools offer hunting, archery, and shooting sports programs to teach students how to responsibly handle firearms,” she said.
On Aug. 4, Ms. Tenney introduced the “Protecting Hunting and Archery in Schools Act” that will remove current federal restrictions on hunting and archery programs. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“The Biden Administration’s attempt to defund these outdoor recreational programs is a power grab and flies in the face of Congressional intent,“ she said in the statement. ”This important legislation will protect these popular after-school programs and end the Biden Administration’s attack on our constitutional rights.”
The Biden administration’s move comes as programs like the National Archery in Schools Program (NASP) have seen “unprecedented growth in participation,” according to the National Rifle Association (NRA) Hunters’ Leadership Program.
NASP, launched in 2002, attracts 1.3 million students from fourth to 12th grade each year. In 2023, students from 49 American states and eight Canadian provinces participated in the program. The NASP national tournament saw the participation of 3,838 youngsters from 36 states.
“In many communities, it’s a shooting sport, and the skills from shooting sports, that help young people grow to be responsible adults. They also benefit from relationships with role models,” he said.
Biden’s ‘Disconnect’ With Americans
In addition to Ms. Tenney, other lawmakers are also introducing legislation to counter the Biden DOE’s latest move targeting school archery and hunting.In August, Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) introduced the “Protecting Hunting Heritage and Education Act.”
A spokesperson from the DOE insisted that the department is only implementing laws “as developed by Congress” and that it is “open to engagement from members regarding changes to this statutory language.”