The notice from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which permits “comments on issues, impacts, and potential new alternatives to be analyzed may be submitted in writing until October 4, 2021,” cites “legal deficiencies” in the Trump administration’s environmental impact statement as motivation for the new statement.
“I think the underlying [legal] claims are laughable,” said David Bernhardt, who served as secretary of the interior under Trump. “This administration is unequivocally opposed to proceeding forward with the law that was passed in 2017.”
“BLM Alaska’s staff worked tirelessly to develop a comprehensive and durable [environmental impact statement] and leasing program in order to issue the first leases in 2021,” Sullivan said in the statement. “The announcement today disregards that fact-based scientific work, as well as the property interests of those who hold these leases, including the State of Alaska.
“It also utterly disregards BLM scientists and Alaskans from across the political spectrum—Republicans, Democrats, Independents, unions, working families, as well the Alaska Natives who live closest to the area and who fought for decades for the right to allow for the responsible development of the 1002 Area of ANWR in order to strengthen our communities and build a better life for our children.”
“Alaskans for over 40 years have urged Congress to develop and implement a leasing program for the Coastal Plain,” Murkowski said in another statement.
“With the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the Secretary is directed to establish two area-wide leasing sales, not less than 400,000 acres each in the Coastal Plain. A distinguished team of career experts and scientists at the Department of the Interior spent thousands of hours over nearly two years developing a full range of alternatives and protective mitigation measures that would apply to all oil and gas activities in the 1002 Area, and now this administration is going to throw it all away and start over because they don’t agree with it. That’s politics plain and simple.”
Bernhardt echoed their criticism, adding that the Biden administration is entitled to request a supplemental environmental impact statement.
“Congress acted in 2017 and really resolved the debate as to whether or not there would be a leasing program for that small area of the 19.5-million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,” said Bernhardt. “We tried to faithfully execute their vision.”
The Sierra Club celebrated the Biden administration’s notice but said lawmakers should go further.
“We are glad to see the Biden administration recognize the serious flaws in Trump’s rushed and illegal approval of drilling in the Arctic Refuge, but what is needed most is an act of Congress to permanently protect this special place from destructive drilling,” Sierra Club senior campaign representative Mike Scott said in a statement.
“We urge members of Congress to act immediately to reverse the pro-drilling provision in the Tax Act, cancel the leases issued by the Trump administration, and shut down this dangerous drilling program once and for all.”
Democratic senators and congressional representatives didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
