After Sen. Bob Menendez’s (D-N.J.) indictment on federal bribery and corruption charges, more than a dozen fellow Democrats, including Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), called for his resignation on Tuesday.
Other Senate Democrats joining the chorus of voices calling for Mr. Menendez to step down included Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).
More calls, later on Tuesday, came from Sens. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.).
Mr. Menendez has disputed the claims and called them a “smear campaign.”
The indictment also names three New Jersey businessmen as co-defendants.
A Fellow New Jerseyan’s Take
Mr. Menendez’s fellow senator from New Jersey, Mr. Booker, made headlines when he released his Sept. 26 statement, offering his take on his embattled colleague, who has been in the Senate since 2006 and is currently working his way through his third term. Mr. Booker praised Mr. Menendez but said he should leave office.“For nearly a decade, I’ve worked in the Senate alongside Sen. Menendez. As New Jersey’s junior senator, I imagine that I’ve had more professional experiences with him than most others, and I’ve witnessed his extraordinary work and boundless work ethic,” Mr. Booker said.
He described Sen. Menendez as “intellectually gifted, tough, passionate, and deeply empathic” and said he valued their working relationship and friendship.
“Senator Menendez is again facing a federal indictment, one that contains shocking allegations of corruption and specific, disturbing details of wrongdoing. I’ve found the allegations hard to reconcile with the person I know,” said Mr. Booker.
“It is not surprising to me that Sen. Menendez is again determined to mount a vigorous defense. And I still believe he, like anyone involved with our criminal justice system, deserves our presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
“A jury of his peers will make the ultimate decision as to whether he is criminally guilty,” he said.
“There is, however, another higher standard for public officials, one not of criminal law but of common ideals.”
“As senators, we operate in the public trust. That trust is essential to our ability to do our work and perform our duties for our constituents.
The lawmaker asserted that because of the nature of the charges, the people of New Jersey cannot overlook the possibility that Mr. Menendez is guilty, and therefore, his ability to fulfill his duties has been compromised.
“Sen. Menendez fiercely asserts his innocence, and it is therefore understandable that he believes stepping down is patently unfair. But I believe this is a mistake. Stepping down is not an admission of guilt but an acknowledgment that holding public office often demands tremendous sacrifices at great personal cost.
Support From Party Leadership
On Sept. 24, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) made much less negative statements, calling the fresh claims against Mr. Menendez “very serious,” but did not call for his resignation.“These are, in fact, indictments that have to be proven under the rule of law,” he said.
“The person who is accused is entitled to the presumption of innocence. And it’s the responsibility of the government to prove that case.”
Aside from that, Ms. Jean-Pierre said the White House’s position is that the accusations against the New Jersey Democrat are a “serious matter” and other decisions about his future in the upper chamber of Congress should be left up to Senate leadership.
The New Jersey senator made his comments at Hudson County Community College’s campus in Union City, where he grew up, and referenced his family history to explain what was found during a search of his residence.
“For 30 years, I have withdrawn thousands of dollars in cash from my personal savings account, which I have kept for emergencies, and because of the history of my family facing confiscation in Cuba,” he said. “Now, this may seem old-fashioned, but these were monies drawn from my personal savings account based on the income that I have lawfully derived over those 30 years,”
The lawmaker also said he would “look forward to addressing other issues at trial.”