Huawei Technologies Co. lawyer James Cole’s prior work at the U.S. Department of Justice created conflicts of interest that should disqualify him from defending the Chinese company in a case of alleged bank fraud and sanctions violations, U.S. prosecutors said in a filing on May 10.
Last week, the prosecutors filed a motion to disqualify Cole, who served as deputy attorney general, the No. 2 official at the Justice Department, between 2011 and 2015. But the motion was sealed and classified, and prosecutors did not make public the reasons behind the move.
“There is a ’substantial risk‘ that Cole could use ’confidential factual information‘ obtained while serving as DAG to ’materially advance’Huawei’s current defense strategy,” the prosecutors said, according to a redacted copy of the U.S. motion filed on Friday in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, New York.
Cole was not immediately available for comment. But in a statement, Huawei said the filing motion sought to strip the company of counsel of its choice while concealing the facts on why.
“The Justice Department’s motion to disqualify Jim Cole makes a mockery of the adversarial process,” the statement said.
The case against Huawei, the world’s largest telecommunications equipment maker, has ratcheted up tensions between Beijing and Washington as the world’s top two economic powers try to negotiate a trade deal.
The company’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, daughter of Huawei’s founder, was arrested in Canada in December at the behest of U.S. authorities for her role in the alleged fraud. Meng has said she is innocent and is fighting extradition.
In Friday’s filing, U.S. prosecutors said Cole’s representation of Huawei poses “irresolvable conflicts of interest.”
As deputy attorney general, Cole “personally supervised and participated in aspects of” an investigation that caused the conflicts, the prosecutors said in the filing.
Details of that probe were redacted, but the filing said the Huawei prosecution is “substantially related” to the matter.
The prosecutors said Cole possessed information from his government work related to his Huawei representation that he could not reveal, and this created the risk that he would rely on the information in breach of his duties to the Justice Department.
Secondly, because the nature of the conflict is classified, the prosecutors said, Huawei cannot obtain enough information for them to waive any conflict.
The case against Huawei and Meng accuses them of conspiring to defraud HSBC Holdings and other banks by misrepresenting Huawei’s relationship with Skycom Tech Co., a company that operated in Iran, putting the banks at risk of penalties for processing transactions that violated U.S. sanctions laws.
Huawei has said Skycom was a local business partner. The United States maintains it was an unofficial subsidiary used to conceal Huawei’s Iran business.
U.S. authorities claim Huawei used Skycom to obtain embargoed U.S. goods, technology, and services in Iran, and to move money via the international banking system.
Last month, prosecutors said they planned to use information obtained through secret surveillance in the Huawei case.
Cole entered a not guilty plea on behalf of Huawei and its U.S. subsidiary at the Brooklyn court on March 14.
By Karen Freifeld
