UK Schools Should Be ‘First to Open, Last to Close’ in Any Future Lockdown

UK Schools Should Be ‘First to Open, Last to Close’ in Any Future Lockdown
Children walk home from Altrincham C.E. aided primary school after the government's policy to close all schools due to the CCP virus pandemic in Altrincham, United Kingdom, on March 20, 2020. Clive Brunskill/Getty Images
Mary Clark
Updated:

Children’s well-being and education should be put first in any future UK lockdowns, England’s Children’s Commissioner said in a briefing for ministers on Wednesday.

In order to keep schools open, pubs and non-essential shops should be closed instead to limit the spread of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus if cases of infection begin to rise again, Anne Longfield said.
“Too often during the first lockdown, children were an afterthought,” Longfield said a statement.

“If the choice has to be made in a local area about whether to keep pubs or schools open, then schools must always take priority.”

The briefing (pdf) is based, in part, on the relatively lower transmission rate of the CCP virus by children compared to adults, and that symptoms are generally milder in children who do contract the virus.

Her report comes after the education secretary Gavin Williams announced in July that all UK schools must re-open in September.

In Longfield’s rationale, schools should be “first to open, last to close,” even at the expense of other sectors.

“All children have a fundamental right to receive an education. Schools and early years settings should be kept open wherever possible,” the briefing states.

“Suppressing levels of infection in the wider community will allow schools to operate with lower risk.”

Staggered school start and finish times, walking and cycling to school to avoid using public transport, and families not gathering at the school gates are among recommended measures to reduce virus spread and help keep schools open.

Nursery children sit apart from each other to minimise the risk of passing on Coronavirus at Willowpark Primary Academy in Oldham, north-west England on June 18, 2020. (Oli Scarff/AFP via Getty Images)
Nursery children sit apart from each other to minimise the risk of passing on Coronavirus at Willowpark Primary Academy in Oldham, north-west England on June 18, 2020. Oli Scarff/AFP via Getty Images
When asked whether he agreed with Longfield’s recommendations on Wednesday, UK Schools Minister Nick Gibb told BBC Radio 4’s “Today” programme that a “more nuanced response” may be needed.

“It does have to depend on the facts of the case, and that’s why the local director of public health will be responsible for the response [to a spike in the virus],” he said.

He said that all children, even those in areas where there are currently local lockdown restrictions, would be returning to school in September.

“But you can’t decree this for every single case, and it will depend on the circumstances of a local increase in the infection rate,” he said.

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, told The Times of London, that getting children back to school, though vital, would depend on measures to stop the spread of the virus.

“The last thing anyone wants to see is the reopening of schools leading to a resurgence of the virus,” Whiteman told The Times. “There are many factors that will contribute to this, most of which are entirely outside a school’s control.”

He called on the government to “ensure that everyone knows what actions they should be taking to keep everyone safe—we’re all going to need to work together to be successful.”

Test And Trace

In order to work effectively, a robust test and trace service needs to be in place when schools re-open in September, the Children’s Commissioner said.

“This will be particularly important in the 2020/21 winter flu season when clusters of flu could be mistaken for a Covid-19 outbreak and result in unnecessary closure or interruption,” the briefing states.

Testing could also allow individual students and their close contacts to be isolated instead closing whole classes, year groups, or schools in response to new cases being detected.

“Rapid tracing must distinguish between the source and the location of infections. Schools could be more likely to be the latter than the former—i.e. infections detected within schools could reflect outbreaks that originated in local workplaces,” the briefing states.

The need for an effective and extensive testing system was echoed by modelling research led by University College London (UCL) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine published in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health journal on Monday.

“To prevent a second COVID-19 wave, relaxation of physical distancing, including reopening of schools, in the UK must be accompanied by large-scale, population-wide testing of symptomatic individuals and effective tracing of their contacts, followed by isolation of diagnosed individuals,” the study authors wrote.

The researchers also said that not increasing testing could result in a second virus wave about twice the size of the original wave.