John Eastman, a legal adviser for former President Donald Trump, appeared on Aug. 31 before a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury over his claims during the 2020 election, which Eastman’s lawyers called “unprecedented.”
During the aftermath of the 2020 election, when Trump was trying to determine how to move forward on his claims of widespread election fraud, Eastman was among the attorneys in Trump’s inner circle who supported an effort to refuse to certify electoral slates from states where concerns of election fraud were most prevalent.
Eastman’s position, which was that Vice President Mike Pence had the power under the 12th Amendment to reject some electoral slates, put Eastman in the sights of the Democrat-dominated House Jan. 6 committee, and more recently, in the sights of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
Willis has been working with the grand jury to probe attempts by Trump and a number of his allies to convince officials in Georgia to investigate possible fraud following the 2020 election.
She asked the grand jury for help with the probe, which she says is based on information that indicates “a reasonable probability” that the election in Georgia was “subject to possible criminal disruptions.”
Willis says the investigation is based on a “multi-state, coordinated plan by the Trump campaign to influence the results of the November 2020 elections in Georgia and elsewhere,” echoing similar statements made by the Jan. 6 panel in Congress.
Trump adviser John Eastman on Aug. 31 appeared before a special grand jury looking into Willis’s probes.
Burnham and Silverglate then blasted Willis’s effort as “unprecedented,” and called on observers “of any political persuasion” to decry it.
“By all indications, the District Attorney’s Office has set itself on an unprecedented path of criminalizing controversial or disfavored legal theories, possibly in hopes that the federal government will follow its lead,” the attorneys wrote.
“Criminalization of unpopular legal theories is against every American tradition and would have ended the careers of John Adams, Ruth Ginsburg, Thurgood Marshall and many other now-celebrated American lawyers,” they continued. “We ask all interested observers of any political persuasion to join us in decrying this troubling development.”