Just hours before cabinet invoked the Emergencies Act, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s national security adviser asked the RCMP in an email for a Freedom Convoy threat assessment and called the protesters “a threat to democracy.”
The email sequence was tabled with the Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) on Nov. 15. The ongoing public inquiry is assessing whether the federal government met the legal threshold to invoke the act to clear Convoy protestors in Ottawa last winter.
“I need an assessment ... about the threat of these blockades. The characters involved. The weapons. The motivation,” wrote national security adviser Jody Thomas in an email to Mike MacDonald, assistant secretary to cabinet from the Privy Council Office (PCO), on Feb. 14.
Thomas sent the email around 11:45 a.m on Feb. 14. Cabinet invoked the Emergencies Act around 4 p.m. the same day.
“Clearly this isn’t just about COVID and is a threat to democracy and rule of law,” Thomas wrote, before reiterating her request for an urgent RCMP assessment of the protests.
“This is about a national threat to national interests and institutions. By people who do not care about or understand democracy. Who are preparing to be violent. Who are motivated by anti−government sentiment,” Thomas said in a subsequent email to MacDonald, sent about 20 minutes later.
MacDonald forwarded Thomas’s request to Mark Flynn, the RCMP’s assistant commissioner responsible for National Security and Protective Policing.
The RCMP responded to MacDonald about two hours later with an assessment, which stated that “the majority of convoy protesters are peaceful and denounce violence,” but added that there was “the possibility of a lone actor attack, inspired by ideologically motivated beliefs.”
“We continue to track and analyze these developments,” wrote RCMP executive director of intelligence and international policing Adrianna Poloz in an email.
MacDonald forwarded a response from Thomas on the same day in which she asked, “How do we know that the majority are peaceful?”
“They are determined to harm individuals to achieve their goals,” she wrote. “Honking and diesel fumes as one example, harassment and threats as another.”
CSIS Assessment
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director David Vigneault recently told the POEC in an interview preceding his testimony that CSIS did not consider the Freedom Convoy to be a national security threat.“There was some snippets of information on open source, and that came through intelligence—things that were similar to the storming of the Parliament—but none of it manifested itself, so it wasn’t a national security threat, it was a national event,” Lucki said on Nov. 15.
One lawyer asked Lucki if she had perceived the Windsor Ambassador Bridge blockade as a “significant national security threat.”
“I wouldn’t define it as a national security threat,” she replied.