In a move that stunned New York dealmakers at the time, the famed Waldorf Astoria hotel on Park Avenue was sold in 2014 to a little-known Chinese company.
That Chinese company is Beijing-based Anbang Insurance Group, an insurance conglomerate known for its aggressive overseas asset purchases, including a failed 2016 bid to acquire Starwood Hotels and Resorts. At the time, Chinese companies were engaged in a global takeover spree, and Anbang appeared to be leader of the pack.
Only a year later, the once high-flying Anbang is suddenly grounded.
Anbang chairman, billionaire Wu Xiaohui, has been detained by Beijing authorities. Meanwhile, several Chinese state-owned banks were told to stop their dealings with the company, sources told Bloomberg on June 15. Its more than 30,000 employees and nearly $300 billion in assets have been left hanging in the balance.
Anbang’s Meteoric Rise
In only a short time, Anbang rose from relative obscurity to become one of China’s largest holders of foreign assets. Before its activities were curtailed, Anbang had become well-known among Western private equity firms and real estate moguls as a competitive bidder for assets.‘White Gloves’
Anbang’s sudden fall seemed as startling as its rapid ascent. What caused the disgrace of Wu Xiaohui, who led a conglomerate described by the Financial Times in 2016 as “one of China’s most politically connected companies”?In China, business is always driven by politics. And Wu’s political network could very well have landed him in trouble.
Wu’s background, like many other Chinese tycoons, is relatively obscure. Born in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, Wu founded Anbang as a small insurance company in 2004. His fortunes elevated after marrying Zhuo Ran, a granddaughter of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Deng Xiaoping.
Overseas Chinese language media and sources of this newspaper note that Wu and Zhou are now divorced, although Wu and Anbang have publicly denied such reports.
Wu, 50, is believed to be a close ally of an influential political faction that is in opposition to the Xi leadership. Jiang Zemin was head of the CCP for more than a dozen years (1989–2002) and continued holding sway over the Chinese regime through a network of cronies for another 10 years (2002–2012). Since entering office in 2012, Xi has waged a battle to uproot the influence of Jiang and his faction.
Sources close to Zhongnanhai, the central headquarters of the CCP, told The Epoch Times that Anbang and Wu have close ties to the family of Zeng Qinghong, the former Chinese vice premier, member of the powerful Politburo Standing Committee, and longtime confidant of Jiang.
The source added that Wu and Xiao used financial transactions to funnel and launder funds abroad on behalf of the Jiang faction, while at the same time parlaying their roles as business tycoons to spy on and influence foreign dignitaries.
Crackdown on ‘Barbaric’ Insurance Sector
Xi Jinping has made reforming the financial industry a core focus this year. At a speech on March 21, Premier Li Keqiang urged authorities to take powerful measures to prevent corruption in the financial sector, which is vulnerable to the advent of shadow banking, bad assets, and illegal internet financing, according to state-controlled media Xinhua.Sources close to Zhongnanhai told The Epoch Times early this year that the Xi leadership is focusing on tackling corruption in the Chinese financial industry in 2017.
China’s insurance industry has garnered immense power—and controversy—during the last six years, a period of deregulation overseen by its former chief regulator, Xiang.
From 2012 to 2016, China’s insurance sector grew 14.3 percent overall, and non-life insurance grew 16.5 percent, according to data from Munich Re. Last year, China overtook Japan to become the world’s second biggest insurance market by premiums.
During this period, the insurance sector has turned into a den of corporate raiders.
Insurers are traditionally bastions of conservatism, holding stable assets such as government securities and corporate bonds. Insurers by nature must consider preservation of their clients’ capital as paramount. These assets are also liquid and can be easily sold to pay back policyholders.
Flush with cash from universal life policies, Chinese insurers embarked on a spending spree, amassing portfolios of risky assets not typically associated with insurance, such as stocks, real estate, and foreign companies. Such assets are risky and illiquid, and could impede an insurer’s ability to repay holders during times of distress.
The insurers most closely associated with such practices are Evergrande Life, Foresea Life—a unit of Baoneng—and Anbang. These companies’ business models closely resemble a private equity fund, where capital is expensive and investment returns are the main focus.
Last year, Foresea and Evergrande amassed a large stake in residential real estate developer China Vanke. A public and protracted dispute to wrest control of Vanke from founder and CEO Wang Shi—one of China’s most famous entrepreneurs—ensued, creating a market firestorm that was finally dispelled after Beijing intervened in December.
In late 2016, China’s insurance regulator criticized the entire domestic insurance industry, calling its aggressive purchases of Chinese companies “barbaric.” Wang Shi also portrayed Foresea’s stock accumulation as “barbarian,” a reference to the 1989 book “Barbarians at the Gate” about the hostile takeover of RJR Nabisco by private equity giant Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
In just six months, Xi has replaced China’s top insurance regulator, banned the sale of universal life policies, and for now, brought a wild industry to heel.
But years of freewheeling cannot be corrected overnight.
Foresea, which depends on cash from sales of universal life products, issued a warning last month to regulators, calling for a lifting of the ban on the products “to avoid mass riots by clients, causing systemic risks and much damage to the wider industry.”
Reference to “mass riots” is anathema to the CCP and a potential challenge to the Xi leadership. The insurance industry, in the end, may not give up without a fight.
