Consumers around the world are installing “smart” home systems for the convenience and control it gives them, but many are unaware of who or what may actually be controlling these systems and for what purpose.
Jackson speculated that an auto response from his smart doorbell that said, “Excuse me, can I help you?” might have caused the delivery person to believe he had heard a slur.
“The driver, who was walking away and wearing headphones, must have misinterpreted the message,” Jackson said. “Nevertheless, by the following day, my Amazon account was locked, and all my Echo devices were logged out.”
Added to this are the many stories that people tell of private conversations they have with a spouse or friend in their home in the presence of a smart phone, after which an advertisement for whatever they were discussing coincidentally appears on their computer or phone.
The Risks of the Internet-of-Things
In March 2023, academics from several European universities published a study titled, “The Digital Harms of Smart Home Devices,” which detailed a number of risks that consumers take when these systems are installed in their homes. The Internet-of-Things (IoT), which refers to physical mechanisms that connect into larger systems via the internet, includes smart security systems, appliances, thermostats, pet or baby monitors, air quality monitors, TVs, speakers, lights, and health and fitness trackers.The “harms” they identified from their research included privacy invasion, hacking, malware, stalking and denial-of-service attacks.
Initially, the authors hoped the study would produce comprehensive data on “how many privacy and security incidents and harms are taking place because of the use of these devices,” co-author David Buil-Gil, a criminologist and lecturer at the University of Manchester, told The Epoch Times. “The first thing we realized is that it was impossible because the police are not recording the data out there, and private companies are not sharing any sort of data with researchers or with government.”
Instead, they collected published research from around the world to try to get a better picture of the situation. The authors, most of whom are based in the UK, are currently working with the government there to build a public-private initiative to generate aggregate case data.
“The main conclusion of the project was that there’s a huge lack of awareness and a huge lack of understanding of what may be happening in our households when we go with those devices,” Buil-Gil said. “Like with any technology, you have two types of users; you have the tech-savvy people that know they are exposing themselves to certain risks … But then you also have other types of users that are not aware of that at all, and that’s the worrying part.”
And the Internet-of-Things extends beyond the home. Another product that is increasingly being absorbed into the IoT is cars.
FBI, CIA, NSA Use ‘Data Brokers’ to Surveil Americans
While corporations have taken a great interest in monitoring people’s behavior for advertising or sales, federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies have also become increasingly fixated on tracking the behavior of everyday Americans.The ODNI report states that the government has been buying CAI from “data brokers,” who “maintain large, sophisticated databases with consumer information that can include credit histories, insurance claims, criminal records, employment histories, incomes, ethnicities, purchase histories, and interests.”
The report notes the “potential for comparable abuse of CAI held by the IC [intelligence community]. In the wrong hands, sensitive insights gained through CAI could facilitate blackmail, stalking, harassment, and public shaming.”
Despite this, the ODNI report states, “CAI clearly provides intelligence value, whether considered in isolation and/or in combination with other information, and whether reviewed by humans and/or by machines. The IC currently acquires a significant amount of CAI for mission-related purposes, including in some cases social media data, [redacted], and many other types of information.”
“The violations that we’ve seen have not just been epic in scale, but they’ve also been persistent, over and over again,” Jake Laperruque, a deputy director at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), stated at a Cato conference on government surveillance.
“What we’re talking about is not just random typos or wrong clicks; we’re looking at things like pulling up batches of thousands of political donors in one go, without any suspicion of wrongdoing,” Laperruque said. “We’ve had reports of journalists, political commentators, a domestic political party; these compliance violations are the most worrisome type of politically focused surveillance.”
This has led some legal experts to call for new laws to protect Americans’ privacy, particularly regarding data collection.
“I think it’s the responsibility of governments to inform citizens what they’re doing with our data,” Buil-Gil said. “We should be working toward a general understanding of data about ourselves, about our everyday activities, who is collecting that data, who owns that data. And legally, and also from an ethical standpoint, how it’s being used.”