A Twitter employee called the office of Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and threatened to lock the lawmaker’s account over a tweet sent during the recent rioting, the senator said Wednesday.
“We asked for an explanation of why that was and it was not really forthcoming. They cited a policy that didn’t apply to my situation,” Cotton said during an appearance on “Fox & Friends.”
“We waited them out, we called their bluff, for 30 minutes they didn’t lock down my account and within about 2 hours they got back to us and said, ‘OK, you can keep your posts up,'” he added.
Twitter didn’t return a request for comment.
Cotton wrote on June 1 that the anarchy, rioting, and looting needed to end as he called for the deployment of a U.S. military division to deal with anarchists and other hooligans fomenting the unrest.
“No quarter for insurrectionists, anarchists, rioters, and looters,” he added.
In an op-ed published on Fox News, Cotton said “no quarter” is a common metaphor for being tough.
The Twitter employee issued an ultimatum, saying the only option was to delete the tweet or lose the account, he said.
“Twitter began as an open platform committed to the free exchange of ideas; over time, it increasingly has taken upon itself the role of politically correct censor of thought-crime by elected officials and ordinary citizens alike. Not surprisingly, the censorship falls overwhelmingly on conservatives,” he said.
Twitter in recent weeks applied a so-called fact-check to Republican President Donald Trump and flagged a missive from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). The company has not appeared to target any Democrat lawmakers.
Cotton and other members of Congress are increasingly eyeing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields Twitter and other technology giants from liability.
“The choices that Twitter makes when it chooses to suppress, edit, blacklist, shadowban are editorial decisions, pure and simple,” the president said. “In those moments, Twitter ceases to be a neutral public platform and [becomes] an editor with a viewpoint, and I think we can say that about others also.”