After months of national debates over election laws, and as Congress prepares to consider the election reform “For the People” Act on its return from recess, national party organizations are turning their eyes to state-level races; specifically to the position of Secretary of State, which plays a key role in running elections. Following the controversy regarding the general election in 2020, ensuring the integrity of elections in the future has been a top priority for Republicans, while Democrats want the position in order to stop alleged voter suppression.
Five crucial battleground states including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Ohio are set to hold elections for the position next year.
And both Democratic and Republican groups have plans to spend millions of dollars on these campaigns. These states are huge political prizes in presidential elections, and each side hopes to win the offices in order to have control over the election process in 2024.
One such Democratic group is iVote, which plans to spend millions to put Democrats into the office in crucial swing states. On a donation page, the group pledges to “[fight] to elect pro-voting secretaries of state and [work] to pass Automatic Voter Registration in states across the country.” In 2018, iVote carried out a similar campaign with the goal of putting Democrats into the Secretary of State positions across the United States with remarkable success. With their help, Katie Hobbs won in Arizona, Jena Griswold won in Colorado, Jocelyn Benson won in Michigan, and Maggie Toulouse Oliver won in New Mexico. Now, the group has similar plans for 2022.
But this big funding will not go unchallenged. In several states, prominent Republicans have announced their candidacy for the office. The Republican State Leadership Committee funded several key state-level elections in 2020, and is likely to throw resources into Secretary of State elections next year.
Arizona
A major battleground in 2020, Arizona’s election has remained an ongoing source of contention as the state carries out a forensic audit of the results of that election, which President Joe Biden was reported to have won. Currently, Democrat Katie Hobbs occupies the office; but Hobbs has announced a gubernatorial run in 2022, opening the gates for a wide field of opponents. The most prominent Republicans vying for the office in 2022 are state Rep. Shawnna Bolick, state Rep. Mark Finchem, and state Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita.During her time in the Arizona House, Bolick has sponsored several elections bills, including H.B. 2095, a bill designed to legally prohibit the delivery of early ballots to those who have not requested them, and H.B. 2362, a bill designed to ensure the privacy of citizens’ ballots.
In an interview with The Epoch Times, Finchem explained his positions further and highlighted some of his plans for the office. First, Finchem criticized Hobbs’ actions during the 2020 election: “Katie Hobbs … [permitted] continued registration of voters past the legislatively-set deadline for registration. They said it was because of COVID … It wasn’t just because of COVID—people had two years to get registered to vote!” Finchem also expressed concern over what he perceived as the taboo on scrutinizing the 2020 election, saying “The American people have never surrendered their right to scrutinize an election. They have consistently asked for assurances that fraud wasn’t in the system.”
Finchem concluded: “The important thing is for people to evaluate candidates on what solutions are they bringing forth … I’m the only one that’s brought serious reasonable measures to the table to help restore voter trust in our system. My focuses are fraud-free elections, transparent processes, protection of the voters’ right to scrutinize an election, and faithfully executing the laws that the legislature has put in place.”
Finally Michelle Ugenti-Rita, an Arizona State Senator, announced her own candidacy.
Georgia
The surprise flip of Georgia to Biden in 2020 has been especially controversial. Many Republicans doubt the election’s validity, while Democrats insist that record-level turnout, not fraud, was responsible for Biden’s razor-thin victory. Still, this flip is one that Republicans cannot afford in the future, and it is almost certain that extreme funding and advertising for the state will be near the top of Republicans’ priorities.Republican challenger and U.S. Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) is among Raffensperger’s critics. Hice is the most likely candidate for the Republican nomination, having received Trump’s endorsement.
Michigan
Given its critical roles in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, Michigan will be a critical target for both parties hoping to ensure control of elections in the state.So far, the field in Michigan is narrow.
Incumbent Democrat Jocelyn Benson has announced a reelection campaign and will likely be the Democratic nominee. Benson’s bio page on her office’s website says that she “is focused on ensuring elections are secure and accessible.”
Nevada
The current Secretary of State of Nevada is Republican Barbara Cegavske, who has served in the office since 2015. Because of the state’s two-term limit, Cegavske will not be eligible for reelection in 2022, opening the field to other Republican and Democratic hopefuls.Ohio
Ohio was a key swing state in the 2016 and 2020 elections. In each, Trump won by a safe margin. But in both the 2008 and 2012 campaigns, the Rust Belt state went to President Barack Obama. In the 2018 midterm, iVote considered Ohio another target state, but failed to beat out Republican Frank LaRose. Now, in 2022, it is possible that they will try to flip Ohio’s Secretary of State again.Still, given the wide margin of Trump’s victory in 2020 (53.5 percent to Biden’s 45.2 percent), Democrats may focus their funding elsewhere.
While preparations for the 2022 elections are only just beginning to get underway, it is reasonable to expect hopefuls in other states to enter the field—especially in battleground states. Both parties will direct funding to key swing states in the hope of reinforcing their 2024 presidential nominees in these critical states. Though this position has historically gone largely unnoticed, it has taken national significance in recent months; in these and other key states, fighting for the position is poised to be more fierce than ever.