In the 1970s, with America’s market opening to China engineered by those peerless (not) ethicists and strategists, Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, China became the “world’s factory” because many of America’s own factories moved there for the cheap and compliant workforce.
Now folks are starting to realize—in part due to the pandemic, evidence of Uyghur forced labor in China, Russia’s weaponizing of gas exports, and Beijing’s threat of war against Taiwan, which could drag in the United States—that moving all our factories to China maybe wasn’t the world’s best idea from the 1970s.
While offshoring to China might have marginally increased profits for the largest corporations, it destroyed local American communities, industrial bases, and denuded many cities—from Detroit to Baltimore—of good jobs.
Transport costs and emissions increased substantially, with the latter not accounted for in the final cost of production. With the loss of some of America’s finest industrial workers sometimes came the permanent loss of their factory-floor know-how.
Overnight, it seems, America empowered the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which can now use all of our lost industrial power against us, in a double-whammy, including by threatening to stop our imports of rare earths, pharmaceuticals, and computer chips. True to form, China’s ally, Russia, is now turning off Europe’s gas right before winter.
Reshoring Accelerates
These same corporations, nudged by U.S. government tariffs and subsidies, are now starting to reverse course and move in the right direction of reshoring American manufacturing. There are variants of reshoring—known as friendshoring, onshoring, multishoring, and nearshoring—all of which are in the right direction as long as they offshore from China and its most powerful authoritarian ally, Russia.(Just in case anyone is counting again: reshoring, reshoring, reshoring.)
To power the trend toward reshoring further requires several measures, according to the organization’s president, Harry Moser. “The reason for offshoring is that the U.S. manufacturing price is consistently too high—about 40 percent higher than China and Vietnam, and 10 percent higher than Europe,” he told The Epoch Times on Aug. 20.
Moser added, “We need to become more price competitive by having a much larger and better-skilled workforce.”
Dollar Devaluation
We should devalue the U.S. dollar and keep corporate taxes low, according to Moser, who believes the dollar is overvalued by 30 percent, which makes our products less competitive versus imports here and when exporting. U.S. capital investment, he said, should stay 100 percent deductible (as it is now) to incentivize more manufacturing and industry here at home.Subsidies Versus Tariffs
Much of the reshoring already underway will be in computer chips (also known as semiconductors), clean energy and transportation, and pharmaceuticals.Moser supports a value-added tax (VAT), which he says is the best kind of tariff.
“Tariffs in the sense of a value-added tax, I believe, is the right solution, because it taxes imports and subsidizes exports and you can rearrange the impact of the value-added tax so it isn’t punitive,” he said.
More broadly, though, Moser argues we don’t have the trillions of dollars required in the long run to achieve reshoring through subsidies alone.
Robotics
Moser argues that as U.S. manufacturing companies reshore, they must turn to robotics rather than mass hiring of industrial workers because “we are in a competitive world” in which industrial labor in China and elsewhere is a third of the price of U.S. labor, and China is automating its industrial processes 15 times faster than the United States.Moser believes this automation is good for American workers, as “we will lose more manufacturing jobs to Chinese automation, Indian automation, or South Korean automation if we do not automate.”
America will still get more jobs from reshoring, as should be clear from the data, but they will be on the high-tech side. Reshoring will provide America with the wealth necessary to invest in higher productivity (less labor for the same output through automation), which will increase GDP “in a virtuous spiral.”
Moser warned that if we don’t reshore through automation, “we are going to offshore until the country collapses.”
German Model of Apprenticeship
German industry enjoys the European Union’s value-added tax (VAT) and devalued currency, according to Moser, which have contributed to its decades-long trade surpluses. (The month of May was the first since 1991 that Germany suffered a trade deficit due to increasing energy and food prices from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.)But Germany has one more advantage lacking in the United States: thriving post-high school apprenticeship programs.
“In the U.S., it’s 3 or 4 percent going into apprenticeships and few of those apprenticeships are in manufacturing.”
Moser points out that those high school graduates who do complete a manufacturing apprenticeship are richly rewarded.
“Graduates of the FAME apprenticeship program in Kentucky are making $96,000 a year 5 years after graduating, which is the same amount of money for the average Ph.D. graduate in the United States, but these programs aren’t getting promoted by guidance counselors.”
Pax Americana, Redux
The greater supply chain stability, national security benefits, and wealth production in the United States that results from manufacturing apprenticeships, reshoring, and friendshoring should outweigh short-term price increases for the consumer in the long run.In the case of the Trump administration’s China tariffs, for example, Goldman Sachs and the Peterson Institute of International Economics estimated that tariffs only increased prices by approximately 0.25 percent (a $100 bill at Walmart rose by $0.25).
Higher per capita wealth and government revenues from reshoring and robotics should provide more opportunities for Americans to focus on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) innovation and education rather than returning to reshored factories as laborers.
Through reshoring and friendshoring, the relative global power of the United States and those who support democracy will increase, helping to defend our democracies from the world’s most dangerous dictators in Beijing and Moscow.
Greater American economic power will then help influence and democratize these autocracies, so we don’t need to worry so much about their military spending, and ours.
We could then reap peace dividends of hundreds of billions of dollars, and avoid wars that cost trillions, not to mention uncountable losses from the destruction of human life and the environment seen daily in Ukraine, for example.