A committee of infectious disease researchers issued a statement this week urging hospitals to stop testing new admissions for COVID-19, saying that doing so will extend patients’ wait times.
“As the pandemic evolved, asymptomatic patient screening had some unintended consequences,” they wrote. “Adverse outcomes related to asymptomatic testing include [those aforementioned delays as well as] strains on laboratory and testing personnel and resources, and increased costs.
“Importantly, assessments of the costs associated with asymptomatic screening are affected by the prevalence of infection in the population tested and the type of test utilized. ... An increasing number of studies have noted the relatively low yield of identification of so-called ’silent' infections, with positivity rates from such testing often falling below 1%.”
A summary of the article stated that “the use of asymptomatic screening is a unique yet resource-intensive tool that arguably has been overused“ and that although it’s imperative to prevent healthcare-associated spread of respiratory pathogens, ”we must critically assess interventions that, when added upon core layers of infection prevention, may not attain the intended impact and may have unintended consequences for patients and [health care personnel].”
The authors of the Cambridge paper cited previous research that found that testing added 1.89 hours to the length of an emergency department stay. Another study they cited found that it cost about $12,500, on average, to identify one asymptomatic COVID-19 patient via asymptomatic testing policies.
Such testing regimes, they concluded, have little to no benefit if other prevention measures are intact in hospitals and other facilities. That includes proper ventilation and hand hygiene, according to the paper.
“With increased population immunity to SARS-CoV-2, milder clinical outcomes, greater access to effective vaccines and therapeutics, and an increased published experience concerning asymptomatic screening, it is important to assess the impact of this intervention and how it should fit into infection prevention programs moving forward,” the group wrote.
SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes COVID-19.
A member of the group, Dr. Thomas Talbot—an epidemiologist at Vanderbilt University—described the benefits of routine COVID-19 testing as “small” and easily overridden by potential harms.