The New South Wales (NSW) education curriculum for Years 3 to 10 will be undergoing major changes as policymakers attempt to address the issue of deteriorating performance.
This builds on the draft curriculum for K to 2, released in late-2021, that made the learning of phonics compulsory again.
The proposed curriculum will also make the teaching of writing the responsibility of English teachers.
At present, all teachers are expected to teach students how to write in the required style of their subjects. For example, science teachers teach students how to write science reports with minimal emotive and descriptive language.
Glenn Fahey, an expert in education policy, told The Epoch Times that Year 9 NAPLAN results for writing are the best prediction for how students perform after they finish school.
Fahey said the problem was that all students entering high school were assumed to already have good foundational writing skills and expected to simply pick up different styles for different subjects.
“Of course, many students are not effective writers by the time they start school and even by the time they finish high school,” he said.
Traditionally, English teachers would drill the fundamentals of writing, including grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation. However, English teachers today emphasise the study of literature and narrative over the development of writing.
“In fact, there is already some resistance on the basis that some English teachers don’t feel that they should be required to teach writing in a range of genres,” Fahey said. “They say it’s beyond the remit of the English subject to do them.”
The English Teachers Association told Sydney Morning Herald that the changes would hand them an “unnecessary burden” because of the different literacy skills between subjects.
Due to decades of declining writing standards, many present day English teachers themselves lack the confidence to teach writing fundamentals.
Caroline Di Russo, a consultant at CX Law, said she has had to explain punctuation to law graduates before.
Fahey said a greater emphasis on memorisation would be welcomed because, by international standards, Australian educators don’t emphasise the practice enough.
“One reason why rote memorisation and routine problems are important [in maths] is because it develops the automaticity of students,” he said. “Without having routinely applied certain algorithms and certain arithmetic, students have to try and solve the problem each and every time they encounter it.”