Victor Hugo had just five months to write his novel “Notre-Dame de Paris,” or “The Hunchback of Notre Dame,” as it is known in English. But the already accomplished French author was completely blocked. An entire year past the deadline he had agreed upon with the publisher, Hugo hadn’t written a single sentence of the book.
Too many other things were competing for his time.
For one, Hugo was distracted by upheaval in France. In 1830, Paris was besieged, gripped by political upheaval, and in the midst of a second revolution.
For another, Hugo and his wife were precipitously evicted from their living quarters because the landlady couldn’t bear all the noise generated by the comings and goings of their friends and colleagues.
Using any excuse to procrastinate with the task at hand, Hugo spent his time going out to the theater instead of staying indoors to write the book.
But when his infuriated bookseller told Hugo that he was in breach of contract and had to deliver the entire manuscript by December 1 or else pay a fine of 1,000 francs a week for every week’s delay, Hugo knew he had to do something drastic to get himself on task.
To that end, he bought himself a bottle of ink and a gray woolen shawl which he could drape himself in. Then he locked away his regular clothing so he would have no temptation to leave the house. Finally, he began to write.
From that day forward, his wife explained, Hugo left his desk only to eat and sleep. His only breaks were an hour of conversation with his friends in the afternoons. In fact, during the entire time he was writing what would be subsequently considered one of the greatest novels of European literature, Hugo left his new apartment only once. On December 20 (he did get granted an extension to February), he tried to attend the trial of King Charles X. Eh voilà. His scheme to beat the procrastination beast worked. He wrote the last line of “Notre-Dame de Paris” on January 14, using the last drop in his bottle of ink.
The Procrastination Problem
Lollygagging, dilly-dallying, dithering—whatever you call it, most of us do it. Even the most productive writers and artists, and the most successful CEOs, have times in their lives or careers when, like Hugo, they become blocked.Procrastination is such a widespread “problem” that countless books and articles have been written about how to beat it. You’ve heard of some of them. Perhaps you’ve even read them: Brian Tracy’s 2017 bestseller, “Eat That Frog!: 21 Great Ways to Stop Procrastinating and Get More Done in Less Time,” Piers Steel’s 2012 more scholarly “The Procrastination Equation: How to Stop Putting Things Off and Start Getting Stuff Done,” and Jane Burka and Lenora Yuen’s 1983 perennial classic, “Procrastination: Why You Do It, What to Do About It Now.”
These are all fantastic and helpful reads. And they all make several arguments against procrastination.
She also told me it’s common to have procrastinators and non-procrastinators in the same family. Indeed, one of America’s lead procrastination researchers, Dr. Joseph Ferrari, a professor at DePaul University in Chicago, insists that there is little to no genetic component to procrastinating.
Lopez agrees.
Positive Procrastination
As much as she sometimes becomes frustrated with the clash between her way of doing things and her daughter’s, however, Lopez says there are unseen and unsung benefits to procrastinating.“Let’s look at the positive side,” Lopez says. “Let’s make sure we look at the pros and cons of procrastination as a concept. What does it do that hinders us and what does it do that helps us and propels us forward?”
Lopez says that her daughter, who thrives off the adrenaline rush that comes from putting something off until she’s nearly out of time, is able to complete tasks at a high level of excellence just before they’re due.
“For the adrenaline junkies like her, it gets them going. This is their fuel. They live for these moments. Bring it on. Here’s the challenge. Let’s get going.”
Enter a concept that I call productive procrastination.
When the impetus to put something off that you feel you need to be doing leads you to do something else that is actually productive and necessary for your health and well-being, procrastination becomes part of a positive and productive process.
But in addition to all of that, although I wasn’t actively thinking about the article I needed to finish, my subconscious must have been at work. Once I was done turning over and watering the compost and I returned to my desk, how to solve a problem with the article’s organization became instantly clear.
Full disclosure: I strive to be an on-time person and the article was late by several hours. I was mad at myself for taking such a long break. But the truth is that what felt like a self-sabotaging delay was actually helping me get the job done. My editors didn’t mind the delay. The procrastination was productive.
My real mistake was my self-directed anger.
Lopez believes there are several upsides to procrastinating.
Arable Land Lying Fallow
Farmers who practice regenerative techniques let their land lie fallow during one or two growing cycles. This technique has been used for centuries in Asia, Africa, and the Mediterranean. An inexperienced eye sees a weed-filled empty field and a profiteer denigrates fallowing because the unplanted soil isn’t turning a profit. But the wise man knows that, as quiet as the field might look, a process of regeneration and rebirth is happening inside the soil. The rest period is giving the land a chance to replenish itself.I believe that’s what Victor Hugo was doing all those years ago. While actively not writing “Notre-Dame de Paris,” Hugo completed at least one book of poems, a play, and a novella. “Notre-Dame de Paris” is considered one of the most important novels of 19th-century European literature. Perhaps, we have Hugo’s productive procrastination to thank, in part, for its excellence.