Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is calling on Republican lawmakers to treat election integrity as a priority issue.
Election integrity came to the forefront in a dramatic way in 2020, with former President Donald Trump and his allies claiming that reduced security measures—primarily related to mail-in ballots—led to fraud that cheated him out of victory.
“I would encourage them to work with the legislature in those states and make sure that their laws are tightened up,“ Paxton said, ”because the credibility of these elections is so important.”
“We don’t want to be Venezuela,” he said. “We don’t want to be another country where people don’t trust the elections, where there’s really no reason to go vote if you don’t know if the integrity of the elections is good.”
Paxton took aim at states with lax election integrity laws, especially around mail-in ballots, such as not requiring photo ID or signature verification. In instances like these, Paxton said, “you’ve got a real problem having any credibility in your elections, and that harms democracy.”
The Texas AG took a prominent role in the contest-of-election thrust following voter fraud allegations in November. He led Texas’s legal efforts to challenge election results in four battleground states before the U.S. Supreme Court, which was later dismissed due to lack of standing.
Local election integrity efforts have borne fruit, however, Paxton said.
“Texas initially had I think it was 12 lawsuits that we fought in our own state over judges, local officials trying to change our laws—that were passed by our state legislature—to force more mail-in ballots, to force us to not have signature verification when we do have mail-in ballots, and so we fought those and we won every single one of those lawsuits and we protected the integrity of our elections,” Paxton said in the interview.
While criticized by Democrats for making voting more difficult, election security measures are being demanded by many Republican voters, particularly in the six states where the GOP controls the legislatures but President Joe Biden claimed victory: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. In all except New Hampshire, former President Donald Trump contested the results.
In the broader debate about election security, Republicans—and conservatives in general—have tended to argue that casting a vote is a privilege of citizenship that should be safeguarded with secure processes and restrictions, and that easing requirements around voting opens the process up to fraud and abuse.
Progressives and their Democrat allies tend to say that barriers to casting a ballot should be as low as possible and that the kind of security measures pushed by conservatives, such as stricter voter ID or proof-of-citizenship laws, amount to disenfranchisement. Progressives often frame the debate as between voter suppression and expansion, while conservatives tend to see it as election security versus vulnerability to abuse.
In the wake of the 2020 election controversy, Republican and Democratic lawmakers across the country have been pulling in opposite directions by introducing legislation that either reduces barriers—and guardrails—to voting or seeks to strengthen election integrity, which can also make casting a vote more burdensome.
