Robert Cahaly, a senior pollster at the Trafalgar Group, believes Pennsylvania’s Republican Senate Candidate Mehmet Oz performed better than his competitor Democrat John Fetterman during the duo’s recent debate.
During the debate, Fetterman used a closed captioning system that provided questions in written form to help him process the meaning of questions put forward by the moderators.
“Oz had to win people over as far as his personality. And he could have been really kind of a jerk. But he was very restrained,” Cahaly said about the Republican candidate.
“And he didn’t seem to be mean, it didn’t come across mean-spirited. And in a situation like that, that would have been easy to do. And I think that was the bridge he had to climb, and he climbed it well.”
Abortion Issue
Abortion was one of the key issues of the debate. During his campaign, Oz made it clear that though he is pro-life, with exceptions to be granted in case the mother’s life is in danger, or in situations involving incest and rape.Oz went on to attack Fetterman, saying that the Democrat wants federally mandated rules allowing abortion at even 38 weeks into pregnancy. Fetterman clarified that his campaign will fight for Roe v. Wade and would push for codifying it into law “if given the opportunity.”
Even though abortion is being projected as a major election issue by Democrats, it isn’t actually true according to Cahaly. Though women care about abortion, it is not as important as other issues like safety from crime and fentanyl proliferation, he pointed out.
“And the interesting thing is the small amount of people who were voting on abortion only, you know, it was their first choice. But nobody had abortion as their second choice,” he said.
Trafalgar Group conducted its survey using a large sample of over 1,000 respondents per state, issuing short questionnaires to regular voters, and giving people multiple ways to respond, including by text, phone, email, or online.