Water Pressure Liberation Day

Water Pressure Liberation Day
Shutterstock
Jeffrey A. Tucker
Updated:
0:00
Commentary
It was nearly 20 years ago that I figured out the scam. Government regulations were ruining water pressure in our homes, taking away a key feature of civilized society.

It was crazy. We know that the pride and joy of old Rome was its aqueducts, which brought fresh running water to cities by force of gravity. They were the major reason for hygiene and sanitation and a sign of civilizational advance.

How is it possible that 2,500 years later, the world’s richest government would turn its back on running water in our homes? It seems simply incredible. It was done in the name of saving water, but the burden fell on domestic use, not factory farms and not industry.

Always the question was: What precisely are we saving water for? A good society directs resources toward the good life in our homes. Cut that out, and you introduce a huge and unexpected problem.

It became obvious with showerheads, which had flow stoppers by law. It stemmed from a passing line in a 1992 energy act, and was further refined in regulations. The stoppers could be removed with pliers, but that became more difficult over time. At some point, I found an affordable one made of plastic that had an easily removable stopper. I bought several, hacked them, and gave them as gifts to friends.

It was the shower in particular that bugged President Donald Trump, who discovered that he could get a great shower in every country but the United States. Even high-end hotels featured that drizzly spray of tepid water that ended up making the shower take twice as long.

But the problem was not only the showerheads. It really began decades ago with the attack on toilets, the maximum gallons of which kept dropping. More and more flushing was required, and there was another effect. Without enough water running through the plumbing, there was chemical buildup and muck developing in the pipes, leaving a stink.

The water problem then hit washing machines. Long a student of washing technology, even to the point of finding it mostly more effective to use only the tub, I promise you the following: There is no way to clean and rinse clothes with minimal water.

This nonsense also affected kitchen and bathroom faucets, such that the pressure alone would never be enough to rinse dishes or shave. As a result, people started having to use all kinds of contraptions to make up the difference.

Indeed, every toilet began to require frequent plunging and replacement parts, and every sink had multiple scrapers and sponges and other tricky things. All the clothing became dingy and soapy. It was made worse after phosphates were removed by law from all detergents. At that point, wearing clean clothes became a thing of the past.

The dishwashers were compromised, too. How is it possible to wash dishes without maximum water? The manufacturers faced the problem in the regulations and overcame it somewhat by running domestic dishwashers for hours and hours. Often, the result is that the debris stays on the dishes and gets baked on by the hot dryer temperature.

The dishwashing detergent also had its phosphates removed, meaning that soapy film would always stain the glasses.

This has gone on for 30 years now, with growing consumer frustration. People blamed the manufacturers, but they weren’t at fault. The government has precise regulations on how all showerheads, dishwashers, toilets, and many other things must be built. It became a kind of American Gosplan.

“Seinfeld” took notice in a famous episode, but otherwise, no one ever seemed to act to reverse course.

Trump has acted with a new executive order, called “Maintaining Acceptable Water Pressure in Showerheads.”

“Overregulation chokes the American economy and stifles personal freedom. ... I hereby direct the Secretary of Energy to publish in the Federal Register a notice rescinding Energy Conservation Program,” the order reads.

It pokes fun at the mountains of regulations defining “showerhead,” noting that the government has 13,000-word regulations describing it, whereas “the Oxford English Dictionary defines ’showerhead' in one short sentence.”

A fact sheet notes: “It’s not just showers—the Biden Administration aggressively targeted everyday appliances like gas stoves, water heaters, washing machines, furnaces, dishwashers, and more, waging war on the reliable tools Americans depend on daily.

“These appliances worked perfectly fine before [President Joe] Biden’s meddling piled on convoluted regulations that made those appliances worse. President Trump is slashing red tape and ending Biden’s dumb war on things that work.”

By way of fairness, this war on water in homes goes back 35 years and more. Even when I was a kid, there was a fashion for putting bricks in toilet tanks, on the presumption that the manufacturer was profligate whereas consumers should be scrupulous and socially conscious. It was never about water supplies, which can be regulated with prices via supply and demand. It was about central planning. It was about mandatory deprivation.

There is still the question of toilets. They are now restricted to 1.6-gallon tanks, whereas they used to hold anywhere from 3 to 7 gallons. They worked better in the old days, as everyone knows. Yes, there have been some improvements, including new designs and electric pressure units. But these are all workarounds and not the real thing.

A few years ago, I visited an old hotel from the 1930s that had not been in use in many decades. It had recently been purchased for the purpose of renovation. As I toured the rooms, everything was still there except one thing. Every single toilet had been removed from every single room. They were more valuable than the moldings, desks, beds, and light fixtures.

A gray market in large-tank toilets existed in the 1990s, but crackdowns stopped those, too. Now they are nothing short of impossible to get anywhere, and I’m unaware of any manufacturer that can legally make one or sell it in any market. None are available on eBay. I doubt that they are even legal to sell.

Tell you what. If Trump liberates toilet tanks, the market for them would be gigantic. I cannot even imagine! Vast numbers of U.S. households would immediately replace theirs in every bathroom.

Can you imagine the sales and profits? They might even compete with iPhones. We are talking tens of millions of units—if only one manufacturer were permitted to sell them and state regulations allowed them.

There’s an agenda item for the Trump administration: Liberate the toilet tank, too. The United States used to be home to the great manufacturers: Kohler, American Standard, Delta, and Moen. It’s another example of an industry that has been largely offshored because of production costs.

I’m not a champion of any form of planning, but it would still be amusing to have the government liberate the toilet, provided it is made in the United States.

In any case, showerheads are an excellent start. Good showers can begin again in 30 days.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Jeffrey A. Tucker
Jeffrey A. Tucker
Author
Jeffrey A. Tucker is the founder and president of the Brownstone Institute and the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press, as well as 10 books in five languages, most recently “Liberty or Lockdown.” He is also the editor of “The Best of Ludwig von Mises.” He writes a daily column on economics for The Epoch Times and speaks widely on the topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture. He can be reached at [email protected]