Commentary
The public health emergency of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic ended long ago, but the United States faces a new emergency. Faith in health agencies has plummeted more rapidly since 2019 than any other government institution, with almost two-thirds now rating the jobs being done by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as “only fair or poor.” Half of the United States no longer has much confidence in science itself.
The loss of trust is part of the disgraceful legacy of those who held power during the pandemic. Two presidents and dozens of governors hid behind public health bureaucrats Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Robert Redfield, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky. They ignored Dr. Donald Henderson’s classic review 15 years earlier showing that lockdowns were both ineffective and extremely harmful. They rejected the alternative, targeted protection, recommended as early as March 2020 by Dr. John Ioannidis, Dr. David Katz, and Dr. Scott Atlas. Beyond a reckless disregard for foreseeable destruction from their policies, U.S. leaders imposed sinful harms and long-lasting damage on our children, the totality of which may not be realized for decades. Mandatory school closings, forced isolation of teens and college students, and required injections of healthy children with experimental drugs attempting to shield adults will be a permanent black mark on the United States. And the truth cannot be denied—the Birx–Fauci lockdowns failed to stop the death and the spread of infection (see papers by Christian Bjornskov, Dr. Eran Bendavid, Virat Agrawal, Jonas Herby, and Phil Kerpen) and inflicted tremendous harms, shifting the pandemic burden to low-income families to spare the affluent.
The next U.S. president needs to lead with strong reforms, because the Birx–Fauci stain on public health and science jeopardizes the credibility of all future health guidance. Here are some recommended initial executive orders:
- Clearly define by law “public health emergency” with strict time limits (e.g., two weeks), requiring legislation to extend. Human rights were violated in the United States. Guarantees of the most fundamental freedoms upon which this country was founded—speech, religion, assembly—were suddenly reversed, without limit, by lockdowners under the guise of “the science” and “safety.” The United States, with freedoms explicitly defined as “endowed by their Creator,” must be managed in concert with its system of laws, even during health emergencies.
- Add term limits (e.g., six years) to all health agency positions, including top- and mid-level posts, after first cleaning house of all heads of the CDC, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the FDA. For instance, Dr. Fauci worked as a bureaucrat for 38 years. Such longevity accrues power and seems to inhibit dissenting voices while setting up unhealthy relationships with outside parties, including the media.
- Forbid all drug royalty-sharing by employees of the FDA, the NIH, and the CDC, and forbid related private jobs for five years after government service. OpenTheBooks revealed that between 2009 and 2021, about 54,000 royalty payments totaling $325.8 million were paid by third-party entities to NIH researchers, sources redacted. We know that Dr. Francis Collins, the NIH’s former director, received 21 payments and Dr. Fauci received 37 payments between 2010 and 2021. This shocking conflict of interest, with hundreds of agency employees garnering personal profit forcibly revealed by FOIA requests, is the most urgent among many reforms.
- Require full transparency of all FDA, CDC, and NIH discussions with immediate posting to public forums. Statements from all advisers in those meetings, such as the startling Oct. 26, 2021, recommendation (“We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is [in children] unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”) of Dr. Eric Rubin, FDA adviser for children’s COVID-19 vaccines, must be widely visible to the public.
- Restate with executive order that the CDC and other health agencies are strictly advisory and do not have the power to set laws or mandates. Limiting health agency power is a way to begin holding elected officials accountable to the citizens, rather than allowing the pretense of hiding behind those agencies.
- Decentralize today’s cartel of NIH funding that controls all academic science careers and university medical centers. More than 15 U.S. medical centers receive more than $500 million each—per year—from the NIH, the dominant funder of all scientific research, to the tune of $45 billion per year. Leverage on individual university scientists who owe their careers to NIH funding explains the February 2020 Lancet publication concocted behind closed doors calling the lab origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus a “conspiracy theory”—perhaps to conceal NIH malfeasance overseen by Drs. Collins and Fauci, who sent more than $2 million taxpayer dollars to fund China’s dangerous gain-of-function research to circumvent our country’s restrictions. Instead, disseminating control of NIH funding across regions with block grants to states would reduce this grip on independent voices.
- Immediately halt all binding agreements or pledges to the World Health Organization (WHO). The United States is the largest funding nation to WHO activities, but the WHO’s record is abysmal. In addition to supporting China’s stonewalling, Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus backed China’s reckless human rights violations, saying that “the Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken to contain the outbreak,” even as it used pseudoscience to essentially imprison its citizens. The WHO disregarded evidence in its guidelines on mitigation, censored its own staff for acknowledging limits of asymptomatic spread, and flipped fundamental definitions such as “herd immunity” to influence behavior, rather than dispassionately informing with data. We must hope Mr. Tedros was joking when he said that “China is actually setting a new standard for outbreak response.” Blind to the obvious need for reassessment, the Biden administration’s ambassador to the WHO, Pamela Hamamoto, already promised that “the United States is committed to the [WHO’s] Pandemic Accord“ even without seeing the final version. In that accord, the WHO will define “public health emergency” for other countries—the fundamental basis to justify restrictions on the public. What is the rationale for any sovereign nation to allow a third party to legally define and impose such a critical state?
From RealClearWire
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
