This summer we saw the wheels come off the “Social” bus. Nearly a dozen large public companies pulled the plug on their DEI initiatives. This is good news for consumers and for the million workers who had to navigate an increasingly politicized workplace. Many corporate executives began remembering that their job is to create value for shareholders by focusing on their customers and delivering goods and services with excellence, not promoting divisive social ideology.
These large public companies have been facing pressure from activist investors like Robby Starbuck, customers, and elected officials. And they’ve determined what critics have known all along: DEI and other Social initiatives are expendable programs. They don’t add to a company’s bottom line nor improve its efficiency. In fact, these DEI initiatives drain time, money, and other resources. Companies don’t need chief diversity officers, sensitivity training, or quotas to recruit and retain good talent or to treat employees fairly.
- Tractor Supply (~50,000 employees; market cap: ~$32 billion)
- John Deere (~80,000 employees; market cap: ~$111 billion)
- Ford Motors (~177,000 employees; market cap: ~$44 billion)
- Lowes (~300,000 employees; market cap: ~$160 billion)
- Harley-Davidson (~11,000 employees; market cap: ~$5 billion)
- Brown-Forman Corp. (~ 6000 employees; market cap: ~$23 billion)
- Molson Coors (~16,000 employees; market cap: ~$11 billion)
- Stanley Black & Decker (~50,000 employees; market cap: ~$16 billion)
- Toyota (~380,000 employees; market cap: ~$270 billion)
- Boeing (~170,000 employees; ~$95 billion)
- No longer funding or participating in social or cultural “awareness” events
- No longer participating in the HRC’s diversity surveys
- Removing DEI language and priorities in their hiring and recruiting
But in recent years, especially starting in 2020, many public companies directed resources to controversial and ideological causes in the name of improving their brand and reputation—such as participating in cultural or social “awareness” events like an LGBTQ+ parade or a BLM gathering. Public companies’ retreat from DEI usually includes statements that they will stick to traditional forms of corporate philanthropy and no longer participate in these controversial social and political activism events.
These companies have also removed DEI language, goals, positions, and training from their operations. For some, they have eliminated “sustainability” and “diversity” positions. Others have removed DEI targets from bonus evaluations for their executives. They have also walked back DEI-based recruitment targets in favor of competence and excellence. Company performance for shareholders, operational excellence, and delivering value to customers have been re-centered in these companies’ policies and strategies.
Even ESG advocates who want to preserve environmental and governance goals should abandon the DEI movement to its fate in history’s dustbin of bad ideas. The summer of 2024 will be noted for the retreat of DEI programs in corporate America. Let’s hope that 2025 will be remembered for the retreat of DEI and other woke ideology across the federal and state governments.