For those who are not doctors, which happens to be most of us, we depend on those few who have dedicated years of their lives to the scientific and medical fields to help inform us so we can make good decisions about our own health. Heading into the pandemic, a public largely jaded toward media and the government still placed high trust in their doctors. That trust has largely been betrayed during the COVID-19 pandemic years. CDC and FDA consultant Dr. Paul Offit’s response to concerns that the mRNA COVID shots may not be safe is an example of that betrayal.
In this specific case, the Florida surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, called for an end to the use of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 shots, because of the discovery of DNA fragments in the vaccines, including the SV-40 promoter, which is associated with cancer. The concern is integration, which is when foreign DNA becomes incorporated into chromosomal DNA, becoming part of the human genome.• DNA integration could theoretically affect a human’s oncogenes—the genes that can transform a healthy cell into a cancerous cell.
• DNA integration may result in chromosomal instability.
• The Guidance for Industry discusses biodistribution of DNA vaccines and how such integration could affect unintended parts of the body including blood, heart, brain, liver, kidney, bone marrow, ovaries/testes, lung, draining lymph nodes, spleen, the site of administration, and subcutis at injection site.
Dr. Ladapo noted the FDA’s failure to provide data or evidence to support its claims, and he correctly stated, “If the risks of DNA integration have not been assessed for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines are not appropriate for use in human beings.”
But the FDA, Dr. Offit, and the others whose reputations and financial benefits are entwined in the official COVID narrative, practice selective science. That is, they tell us only what they want us to hear, and they present only the data that support their narrative, which is, in a word: propaganda.
“It is hard to imagine that this person has been trusted to provide FDA or CDC advice on these mod-mRNA products,” he said.
Dr. Malone stated: “The issue is whether there is a safe threshold for DNA fragment contamination when co-delivered via self-assembling cationic lipid nanoplexes together with modified-mRNA. If so, show us the data which proves that this is a safe level of adulteration. [Dr. Ladapo] asked the FDA to show those data, and FDA’s director of CBER (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research) Peter Marks responded with lies, falsehoods, gaslighting and a complete failure to disclose such data – which apparently do not exist. Much like the approach used here by Offit.”
Dr. Offit sought to put DNA fragments into perspective as harmless by pointing out that the trillions of bacteria living on your body are also foreign DNA. “Assuming you live on this planet and you eat animals or plants on this planet,” Dr. Offit said, “you are ingesting foreign DNA.” Dr. Offit also stated that all vaccines are made in cells, and that “any viral vaccine that’s made in cells will have residual quantities of DNA.”
However, Dr. Livermore said he believes that the COVID shots are of concern for greater and more common reasons than transfection:
“The simpler good reasons to avoid these vaccines and to stop their use in the vast majority of people are that (i) they simply don’t provide any lasting protection, (ii) repeated boosters may distort innate immunity so as to increase vulnerability and (iii) most of us have achieved, through infection, the same sort of immune equilibrium we ‘enjoy’ with other respiratory coronaviruses. Why take anything with some potential hazard and no lasting benefit?”
The continuing controversy of the COVID mRNA shots centers on multiple regulatory agency failures to comply with long-established protections for the public. From the truncated clinical trials and the suppression of serious adverse reactions that occurred in 1 out of every 800 shots given, to the concerted effort to ignore abundant proof of massive vaccine harms, to the dogged (and incorrect) claim that COVID vaccines have saved millions of lives, the public has been denied accurate information regarding the COVID-19 shots.
Retired physician Dr. Steven Kritz noted that there are valid reasons why full vaccine evaluation, before release for general use, usually takes 5–10 years. Operation Warp Speed was not a miracle of modern medicine. It was a rush job to release a product that still needed years of work before being proven safe for mass administration to the population. Dr. Kritz stated, “To recommend/mandate the jab for people at virtually zero risk from the virus, and it was known early on who was at greatest risk and who was at almost zero risk ... amounts to assault and battery.”
Internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker said the matter of whether or not the COVID shots should continue to be administered is a simple “No,” for two main reasons:
1) The jabs are adulterated with the DNA that isn’t supposed to be in there. Adulterated medical products, by law and by any ethical standard, should be pulled from the market.
2) Nobody, not Dr. Offit or anyone else, really knows the dangers of this DNA contamination. Anyone can say they do, or can say injury is highly unlikely, or conjure up odds of harm, but they don’t know. The burden of safety is on the MANUFACTURER, not the consumer. Full stop.
We are in a battle of information, and medicine is one of the battlegrounds. It might be easy to dismiss Dr. Offit as simply an incompetent government official and move forward. However, Dr. Offit is part of something very ugly that seeks to control the population of the world through top-down “emergency mandates” declared because of a virus, or climate change, or civil unrest, or international conflicts. Any emergency will do.
“The small group of dissidents upended their narrative,“ he said. ”Uptake rates on the new boosters are in the low single digits .... Now I’m troubled by the fact that at the same time, we don’t see a massive majority acknowledging the vaccination campaign was a mistake in the first place .... It’s important to stand up and say ‘I was had,’ and I think all of us were.”
The deciding factor is distilled down to this: Do you want your future ability to participate in the public square to be based on which medicines and injections you take?
If that sounds like a preposterous question to you, you have forgotten that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the abilities to work, to travel, and to participate in society were largely based on two medical interventions: wearing a face mask and showing proof of COVID vaccination. Many complied so as to not make waves, or in the hopes that if they conformed, they would get their lives back. But unfortunately, a pattern was set by those who will try it again.
Mr. Weinstein stated: “I think it is fair to say that we are in the middle of a coup .... We are actually facing the elimination of our national and our personal sovereignty .... That is the purpose of what is being constructed .... Come May of this year your nation is almost certain to sign onto a [WHO] agreement [in which] a public health emergency which the director general of the World Health Organization has total liberty to define in any way he sees fit, in other words nothing prevents climate change from being declared a public health emergency that would trigger the provisions of these modifications ... the provisions that would kick in are beyond jaw dropping.”
Mr. Weinstein said that what has been proposed are a number of measures that would be imposed by the WHO in the event of an arbitrarily declared “public health emergency,” measures including mandating gene therapy injections, mandating vaccines, prohibiting travel without a vaccine passport, and forbidding the use of medications other than those authorized by the WHO. Central to the plans under discussion is the control of “misinformation,” which of course, is anything that goes against the official narrative.
People such as Dr. Offit are squarely in the camp of silencing dissent and mandating medical interventions as soon as they can drum up the next emergency. However, there are more people who do not want the life that the technocrats, corrupt government officials, and globalists are planning for us than those who do. As tired as we are of thinking about the pandemic, we have a moral responsibility to push back and preserve our freedoms and way of life for ourselves, and especially for future generations.
