Two shocking immigration-related stories highlight open border fiascos in the United States and the UK.
Were these the natural course of events in both countries, or were they the result of purposely implemented policies?
The UK Experience
Two main immigration concepts turned UK demographics upside-down since World War II: the British Nationality Act of 1948 and free movement among European Union populations guaranteed under Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union.The 1948 act, which was passed into law by Clement Atlee’s Labour government, granted subjects of the British Empire the right to live and work in the UK. The main provision was this: “Every person who under this Act is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or who under any enactment for the time being in force in any country mentioned in subsection (3) of this section is a citizen of that country shall by virtue of that citizenship have the status of a British subject.” The act covered people from these countries: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan, Southern Rhodesia, and Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon).
One of the key rights of citizens of the EU is free movement among EU nations. As the European Parliament website notes, “It is this EU citizenship that underpins the right of persons to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.” The legal basis is provided in Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as established by the Treaty of Maastricht of 1992.
Another result of these immigration pressures is that “only 46.2% of the population of England and Wales described themselves as Christian” in the 2021 census, and “the percentage of people saying they had no religion jumped from around a quarter in 2011 (25.2%) to over a third in 2021 (37.2%),” according to the Office for National Statistics.
Indeed, these rapid demographic changes and the resistance of many of the immigrants to “British acculturation and assimilation” were some of the impetuses behind popular support for the UK’s exiting the EU on Jan. 31, 2020, which ended the free movement of migrants from continental Europe to the UK.
And now, in 2022, there are calls in Parliament for the disestablishment of the Church of England and its influence on school curricula, as noted above. What other similar earthquakes are in store for the UK over time?
The US Parallel
U.S. immigration was similarly influenced by government policies over the decades. To fully absorb and assimilate millions of immigrants from Europe in the early 20th century, U.S. immigration laws were enacted by Congress such that there was virtually zero immigration into the United States between 1925 and 1965, except for carefully selected entrants via a strict quota system.According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 “abolished the national origins quota system but still maintained the principle of numerical restriction by establishing 170,000 Hemispheric and 20,000 per country ceilings.” That act, passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by a Democratic president, was the first of many efforts aimed at opening immigration and granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens in the United States.
In response to popular pressure to deal with the illegal immigration problem, the 2006 Secure Fence Act authorized the construction of a partial border fence along 700 miles of the 2,000-mile U.S.–Mexico border.
In 2012, then-President Barack Obama signed an executive order creating Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which offered deferred action from deportation and eligibility for a work permit for illegal aliens brought into the United States as children. The Democrats have used DACA ever since to advocate for more immigration and amnesty. Still, their efforts were stymied by Donald Trump, who campaigned in 2016 to “build the wall” on the U.S.–Mexico border to stop illegal immigration. Democrats in Congress and open-border Republicans were able to largely thwart the completion of that wall by withholding funds for its completion during the Trump presidency.
The Democrat push for keeping the border wide open has continued relentlessly on other fronts:
Concluding Thoughts
Open border policies in the UK and United States directly result from laws passed by left-wing governments in both countries.The UK is undergoing some dramatic cultural, societal, and political changes largely because of a long-term open border strategy pursued over the decades by the Labour Party (with some Tory assistance—or at least negligence—along the way).
Although lagging behind the UK, the United States is following the same trajectory because of the open border policies of the Democratic Party (with the assistance of the Republican establishment).
Americans simply need to observe what’s happening in the UK to see what’s in store here unless U.S. immigration laws are strictly enforced and a physical wall is completed on the U.S.–Mexico border.