Last week, 21-year-old low-level Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Douglas Teixeira was arrested and charged with violating the Espionage Act and leaking sensitive defense material.
Among other things, the leaked top-secret documents show that the Biden administration has been misleading the public about the reality of the situation in Ukraine, overstating the country’s success in its war with Russia.
The real story, however, is how corporate media organizations, rather than focusing on the content of the revealing documents themselves, chose to focus on finding out who leaked them.
He’s completely right. This story exposes the complicity of our nation’s media with our nation’s intelligence community.
From there, the documents began to spread. On March 4, 10 documents appeared on Minecraft Earth Map, a Discord server focused on the video game. Then, on April 5, classified documents were posted on Russian Telegram channels and the message board platform 4chan.
He went so far as to speak with members of a separate Discord community, who told him that the classified documents had been first posted on a now-deleted server called Thug Shaker Central. One of the people who spoke with Toler told him that they knew the identity of the person who was responsible for the original posting of the classified documents. The hunt was on. He also reached out to the Department of Defense and was told that they were actively reviewing the matter and had made a formal referral to the Department of Justice for an investigation.
Rather than report on the information contained within the leaks, the newspaper focused solely on providing information that could lead to the identification of the whistleblower, whom the Post described as a “charismatic gun enthusiast” who led a group “united by a mutual love of guns, military gear, and God.”
Unlike The Washington Post, which provided specific clues about the alleged leaker, the NY Times went further, identifying the young National Guardsman as Teixeira.
The Times also furthered the same narrative as The Washington Post, referring to Teixeira’s online group as being composed of young men “who came together over a shared love of guns, racist online memes and video games.”
They noted that “as reporters from The New York Times gathered near the house on Thursday afternoon, about a half-dozen FBI agents pushed into the home of Airman Teixeira.”
The NY Times also continued to push the narrative that “according to people who knew him online, Airman Teixera was no whistleblower.” Providing no evidence whatsoever, the NY Times claimed that, unlike previous leaks of information, “outrage about wrongdoing or government policies does not appear to have been a factor.”
As was noted earlier, many questions remain. For one thing, it seems highly unusual that the NY Times not only outed Teixeira’s identity but was literally there as the FBI showed up at Teixeira’s house.
The other major question all of this raises is, did the NY Times and The Washington Post really lead the intelligence community to Teixeira? Or did the intelligence community lead the NY Times and the Post to Teixeira?
How did Bellingcat miss months of the documents being posted online, only to become involved just as the news was emerging? Did a young, low-level airman really act alone or was he provided the information? If so, by whom?
Again, I have questions.
We need to understand exactly how Teixeira came by his information, how he went through the process of selecting what to take, and how he got the actual documents out of a supposedly secure facility for months without anyone knowing. Was he truly working alone, or did he have assistance?
“Teixeira needs to explain how he obtained the leaked information, step by step. There’s either much more to the story or we have major holes in our systems. Post Manning/Snowden I find that hard to believe based on my time in the intel community.”
I would add that it isn’t just Teixeira, but our government that needs to explain those things as well.