The violent rejection of this reasonable approach by Palestinians and other Arabs is what led to the Independence of Israel and the Nakba of 1948. Continued Palestinian rejection of Israel fostered continued wars and Palestinian land loss. Hamas and its supporters now perpetuate this self-defeating “Palestinian” strategy.
As Israel learned over the years, Hamas is undeterrable because it does not really care about Palestinians. It cares about the material support it gets from Iran. The Palestinian Authority, in which the Biden administration puts so much hope, is likewise problematic. It “glorified” the Oct. 7 massacre, according to The Wall Street Journal, and is close to paying the families of Hamas “martyrs.” The Journal noted on Jan. 15 that the administration is, therefore, premature to discuss a “two-state solution.”
The solution for Palestinians today—the true path to peace and health—is not two states. Neither is “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians to nearby Arab states acceptable, as promoted by some far-right Israelis. The former would submit to terrorism, and the latter is genocide.
The better approach is what the current Israeli government is doing, minus the civilian casualties and creeping land theft. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is securing the borders of Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza, and subduing terrorists that attack these territories.
Two-states would only make the situation worse as long as Hamas and its supporters—the mullahs in Iran and the Saudis, who support two-states—fail to change their minds about terrorism as an acceptable means. The Biden administration, unfortunately, is desperate for any solution, and so staked out a middle ground of political expediency between regional powers rather than a principled position of the right of Jews and Arabs to live side by side in the Middle East in peace.
The Biden administration follows its voters, biased by their leftist understanding of history that sees Jews in Israel as instituting “white settler colonialism,” “apartheid,” or “genocide” rather than as a minority religion hanging on for dear life in the only territory it has, and surrounded by hostile and aggressive states and proxies.
But the mistake in Afghanistan was to build a corrupt government of Afghans, who took drug money from the Taliban and caved to them as soon as we left. The Kabul government did not prioritize democracy or peace, and Afghan civilians paid the price.
Hamas and, arguably, the Palestinian Authority are likewise motivated by money and power rather than justice. Jerusalem is now rightly more careful about establishing quasi-governmental authoritarians to rule over and influence Palestinian civilians. Another approach entirely, which Mr. Netanyahu supports, is therefore reasonable: long-term Israeli control of the borders.
But this puts the responsibility for Palestinians within those borders on Israel. This should be welcomed by Jerusalem as a way to both demonstrate Israel’s humanitarian commitment to Arabs within its borders and to conduct counterterrorism against Hamas and any other terror group that might emerge in the future.