They certainly can’t be happy in Beijing. An exceedingly technical administrative decision in Washington will soon result in investors pulling tens of billions of dollars in investments from a cash-strapped China.
Previously, the I Fund tracked the MSCI Europe, Australasia, and Far East Index. The Thrift Board decided on Nov. 14 to instead track the MSCI All Country World ex USA ex China ex Hong Kong Investible Market Index.
The new index doesn’t include Chinese and Hong Kong stocks, so to match the assets of the I Fund to the new index, the Thrift Board will have to sell Chinese and Hong Kong stocks and not buy them in the future.
The switch in indices of the Thrift Savings Plan, essentially the 401(k) plan for federal employees, will take place next year.
Sound unimportant?
The Thrift Board made one of the most consequential investment decisions of the year, and it will undoubtedly affect allocations of other investment managers, in the United States and perhaps elsewhere. In short, this move will be a blow to China’s failing equity markets, delivered at the worst possible moment for Beijing.
Participants had invested $68 billion in the I Fund as of the end of October.
The Thrift Board’s decision is a “major victory” for those, such as Roger Robinson, who had been campaigning for years to get the Thrift Savings Plan, known as the TSP, to divest from China.
“The new MSCI ex China ex Hong Kong index employed for the I Fund sets a precedent for the exclusion of all Chinese companies,” Mr. Robinson, the National Security Council’s senior director for international economic affairs under President Ronald Reagan and now chairman of the Prague Security Studies Institute, told Gatestone. “This precedent should be adopted by other U.S. index providers and associated exchange-traded and other index funds.”
“There remain hundreds, if not thousands, of Chinese enterprises littering the investment products of the TSP-sponsored Mutual Fund Window,” he said. “The TSP Act of 2023 would accomplish this urgent undertaking.”
Wall Street for years has been in love with Chinese companies even though they had clearly earned failing grades across the board for, among other things, fiduciary responsibility, labor practices, and human rights. While prices were rising, the Street ignored concerns. Now, they’re weighing heavily on investment managers.
So why should companies continue to get special access to U.S. equity markets just because they come from China?
Or why should they have any access at all? “If you understand that we are already in an economic war with China, it seems foolish to grant access to our markets,” Kevin Freeman, host of BlazeTV’s “Economic War Room,” told Gatestone. “Imagine funding the Nazi war machine in the late 1930s. Delisting military-related companies should be obvious. Under Communist Party dictates, any Chinese company can be made to serve military interests at any time.”
The Chinese economy and financial markets are fragile. It’s time to cut off all the blood supply to the Nazis of the 21st century.