The latest absurdity is that a noncitizen was appointed to office in San Francisco, the first time such a thing has happened in this country.
Think about that for a moment. Somebody who isn’t a citizen and isn’t even legally allowed to vote—for now—is now supervising elections in a U.S. city.
Here’s Ms. Wong’s victory speech, posted by Citizen Free Press.
She reportedly knows English, but why make any attempt to demonstrate any attachment to U.S. norms and customs when you can get celebrated for flaunting them?
Ms. Wong came to the United States in 2019. Nothing seems to bind her to this country in any way besides the fact that she now holds office.
That raises several questions. If China and the United States went to war, to which country would Ms. Wong be loyal?
Is Ms. Wong a literal Manchurian candidate? Is San Francisco simply becoming a province of China?
The potential for spies to infiltrate the U.S. system is only one part—perhaps the smaller part—of why allowing noncitizens to vote or to hold office in our country is so problematic.
The modern left is insistent on making the concept of citizenship irrelevant. But this isn’t about China or any other country. It’s about our country essentially abandoning its republican, constitutional system based on the consent of the governed and the rule of law.
To take it a step further in the warped political and moral framework through which the modern left views the world, citizenship may even be a negative. After all, a noncitizen is likely higher on the hierarchy of oppression and more worthy of rights and rewards granted by the state.
There may have been a time when the left feigned some opposition to illegal immigration, but that time has passed.
What we are left with, when all is said and done, is a country that’s hardly a country at all.
I’ve had difficulty coming up with a name for this sort of political system, but it certainly isn’t a republic, nor is it really a “democracy.”
In the old days, when federalism was stronger, people used to say the United States “are” this or that. More recently, as the country became more centralized and nationalized, people would say the United States “is” this or that. That distinction is now sliding away, too.
California is giving us an early preview of this future. The rest of the country now must decide whether this is the kind of “progress” we want for ourselves and our posterity or whether we hold on to our once enormously successful system of ordered liberty.