Netball Australia Players Should Consider Their Own History Before Virtue Signalling

Netball Australia Players Should Consider Their Own History Before Virtue Signalling
Cara Koenen of the Australian Diamonds during game two of the Constellation Cup series between the New Zealand Silver Ferns and the Australia Diamonds at TrustPower Arena in Tauranga, New Zealand, on Oct. 16, 2022. Mark Tantrum/Getty Images
Matthew Ogilvie
Updated:
0:00
Commentary
A wise Rabbi from Nazareth once said you should take the plank out of your own eye before you attend to the speck in another’s. It is a principle that Australian Netball should have remembered in its recent controversy over Hancock Prospecting and its, now former, sponsorship of the Australian Netball team.

A number of players took issue with Hancock Prospecting, the opinions of Gina Rinehart about climate change, and in particular, a statement Lang Hancock (Rinehart’s father) made in 1984 about sterilising and breeding out Aboriginal people.

The debacle cast a shadow over what should have been a celebration with the imminent debut of a player who would have been the first Indigenous member of the national team in 25 years and the third ever.

However, even that cause for celebration raised a serious question. If Wallam was only the third indigenous player on the national team ever, what is Australian Netball’s record on Aboriginal participation? The answer is not encouraging.

About four percent of those involved in Australian netball are Indigenous. But the high level of grassroots participation does not result in elite and representative participation. In fact, only three Indigenous players have made the national team, called the Diamonds, in almost a century of Australian netball.

Discrimination in the Highest Level of Competition

Sharon Finnan-White, the second Indigenous member of the Diamonds, has alleged there is a bias against Aboriginal players and an allegedly racist culture that has prevented Indigenous players from rising up through the pathways for elite players.
She alleged of Fox Sports that: “A lot of our players haven‘t been able to get into the pathway because of unconscious bias and stereotyping and racism.”

Finnan-Whites claims are supported by others, including Celeste Carnegie, an advocate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders’ digital inclusion.

In an article titled “Racism in Australian netball ended my career before it even began,” Carnegie wrote that Aboriginal people have a natural aptitude for netball.

“We are quick, we are strategic, and our innate ability to communicate non-verbally translates into the game seamlessly. Our style of play is different; it is unique and great to watch,” she said.

So why does this natural talent not seem to do them any favours for their endeavours in elite netball.

Carnegie alleged she had her own experiences of exclusion, discrimination and a lack of cultural understanding from Queensland netball and argued that “it is time for Netball Australia and the state netball bodies to take ownership and responsibility for their treatment and actions regarding the perpetuation of discrimination and racial prejudice towards Indigenous peoples.”

Perhaps this is illustrated in the case of Jemma Mi Mi.

As the only Indigenous player in the league, she was used as the poster girl to promote Super Netball’s Indigenous Round.

Yet, when it really mattered, she was benched for an entire game. The video of the game is heartbreaking. The woman used to promote a round celebrating her people watching from the sidelines, eager to play.
Jemma Mi Mi of the Firebirds catches the ball during the Super Netball Round 2 match between Sunshine Coast Lightning and Queensland Firebirds at USC Stadium in the Sunshine Coast, Australia, on April 2, 2022. (AAP Image/Jono Searle)
Jemma Mi Mi of the Firebirds catches the ball during the Super Netball Round 2 match between Sunshine Coast Lightning and Queensland Firebirds at USC Stadium in the Sunshine Coast, Australia, on April 2, 2022. AAP Image/Jono Searle
In April this year, sports journalist Linda Pearce wrote about what she said was the “broken system” in Australian netball and alleged there was an atmosphere of persistent racism that still prevents Indigenous players from reaching elite levels in the sport.
However, to their credit, Netball Australia is aware of the problem and has issued a commitment to fix the problem.

Twenty of its key organisations made a “declaration of commitment ... to break down the barriers that have prevented Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander players, coaches, umpires, and administrators from flourishing in the sport.”

Such a commitment is laudable. But at the same time, it reflects a deep and persistent problem in the sport, which returns us to the beginning of this article.

Yes, in 1984, Lang Hancock said some things about Aboriginal people that people would find distasteful and repugnant. And yes, it would be good for the players to have an honest and respectful discussion about that history.

But it seems hypocritical to virtue signal considering Australian netball’s own dismal record on Indigenous participation.

The players, who are so willing to support one of their own, need to first scrutinise their own organisation.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Matthew Ogilvie
Matthew Ogilvie
Ph.D.
Matthew Ogilvie, Ph.D., is an Australian-based academic and writer. For over 30 years, he has served at universities and colleges in Australia and the United States. He currently serves in leadership positions for the Western Australia State Council and the Federal Council of the Liberal Party of Australia. In his "spare time," he is a self-defense instructor and venomous snake catcher.
Related Topics