Cardinal George Pell was a paradoxical figure. His life and work will give ammunition to those who admired him and those who hated him, as we see in the conflicting articles about him in the media.
While he rightly deserved criticism for his treatment of a number of victims of child abuse, he was the first Catholic leader in Australia to initiate a proper redress program for victims.
A boxer and footballer as a young man, he brought a confrontational and pugilistic personality into the public arena. But in person, he was honest, warm, caring, and genuinely interested in people.
He was fiercely loyal to the Pope, yet outspoken when he saw the need.
He saw no gain in the treaty for Catholics and noted that persecution of people of faith were getting worse. He also criticised the secrecy of the agreement.
In the same interview, he criticised the treatment of Catholic traditionalists and restrictions on the celebration of the traditional Latin Mass.
Pell’s vocation was cut short by charges from which he was ultimately acquitted, unanimously, by Australia’s highest court.
Pell’s Mark on the Church
In terms of his legacy to the Church, the most notable was that he made orthodoxy viable for conservative or traditional Australian Catholics.By the early 1990s, many of them felt, rightly or wrongly, that they were marginalised by an increasingly liberalised Church. Cardinal Pell became a central figure who made conservatives feel that they were not just part of the mainstream but that they were the mainstream of the Church.
In his pursuit of traditional Catholic truth, Cardinal Pell had a strong emphasis on education. Asked why he wanted orthodox Catholic teaching in schools, he remarked that he wanted students to at least know from what they were dissenting.
His pugilistic instincts and no-nonsense approach made him an ideal candidate to be appointed Prefect of the Vatican’s economy ministry in 2014. There he found that the Vatican’s finances were worse than could have been imagined.
There have been suggestions that the criminal case against him was influenced by the enemies he made.
Despite many pressures, he worked to ensure that the Vatican’s finances were subject to the strictest of international standards of transparency and accounting. If his work is continued, it will have the potential to be the most comprehensive reform of Vatican finances in hundreds of years.
People will have mixed memories of Cardinal Pell, but he will have an enduring legacy. Whether it is the confidence he gave to orthodox Catholics, his influence on the appointment of Church leaders and educators, or his work to reform the Holy See’s finances, he will be remembered in equal measure by his friends and foes.
One might also be hopeful that part of his legacy will be an increased scepticism of mainstream media reporting.
Since his death, too many reporters have written about the Cardinal as if he was guilty of the crime of which he was acquitted unanimously by the High Court of Australia.
The willful ignorance and manipulation of truth on display in the mainstream media make one hopeful that people will turn to more reliable sources of information.