John Robson: When the Polls Are So Bad That the ‘Burning Earth’ Carbon Tax Excuse Takes a Back Seat

John Robson: When the Polls Are So Bad That the ‘Burning Earth’ Carbon Tax Excuse Takes a Back Seat
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau makes announcements about the carbon price policy in Ottawa on Oct. 26, 2023. The Canadian Press/Sean Kilpatrick
John Robson
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

The global boiling climate breakdown age of fire is so serious that no price is too high to pay to stop it. Except Liberal parliamentary seats in Atlantic Canada in our gravely unserious nation.

Thus we awoke recently to snow in the backyard. No wait, to news that the federal carbon tax on home heating oil will be suspended for three years because the urgent man-made climate crisis isn’t really that serious after all. Or their magnificent policies won’t actually help anyway. Or Liberal polling numbers are looking so grim that the burning Earth must wait.

It would be tempting to assume the prime minister is being cynical, partly because many people nowadays think anyone who claims to disagree with them is a lying fraudster and partly because, from fiscal prudence to open government to abolishing first-past-the-post, his deeds have long and spectacularly failed to match the plain meaning of his words. And here he’s removing the tax on home heating oil, heavily used in the Atlantic provinces but rarely elsewhere, but not on natural gas.

Trudeau didn’t try to hide the regional calculations: “We’ve heard clearly from Atlantic Canadians through our amazing Atlantic MPs that since the federal pollution price came into force ... certain features of that pollution price needed adjusting to work for everyone.” But he insisted that “We are doubling down on our fight against climate change and keeping true to the principles that we’re supporting Canadians while we fight climate change.”

Brrrr. Imagine talking that way. If you recite talking points continually the iron enters the soul, like the PR guy in “Jurassic Park” (the book) who imagines publicity headlines even as a T Rex mauls him. But any theory that Justin Trudeau secretly agrees with me on everything and is just faking it for sinister purposes does not pass the smell test. So let’s seek some explanation that avoids the rabbit hole.

How about frivolity? What if the almost whimsically shallow rationalizations politicians present publicly are all they’ve got? When Trudeau said “We have to make sure we’re fighting climate change in ways that support all Canadians” he might really think he’s nailing the balance between aggressive action and public buy-in. The old “what you see is what you get” theory.
It’s irritating when emissions keep rising and poll numbers keep plunging. But Rome wasn’t built in a day, right? As the Liberal Atlantic Caucus chair put it, “We’re delivering a program that’s not only going to help people today by exempting the carbon price this winter but ... making sure we have programs to help make that transition long-term.” And for that we need to, um, cling to power.

Trudeau also said, “We are nothing if not a government that listens to people, that is focused on our goals and is willing to adjust as necessary.” And the Grits, despite current woes, have dominated national politics since the death of Sir John A. Macdonald largely through their capacity to be firm but flexible, balancing competing principles in electorally compelling ways.

There is an argument for being governed by rogues rather than fools if forced to choose. As Alexandre Dumas said, rogues take vacations. Also, cunning schemers who really know what’s going on might pull themselves together in an emergency. And who wants to be nibbled to death by ducks? If I must be devoured, let it be a lion. Yet the soundtrack to my pain is quacking.

Does Trudeau really consider man-made climate change an existential crisis? Absolutely. Does he really believe his policies nibbling away at Canada’s trivial GHG emissions will fix global weather by 2100? Absolutely. Does he really think pausing this one until re-elected will help him save us from ourselves? Absolutely. Is it all absurd? Absolutely.

It’s also absurd that Canada lacks functioning armed forces in a dangerous world and our politicians send DND more culture wars, not more spending. And that the government responds to exploding debt by scrambling to hire more bureaucrats. And that it frivolously gives itself harsh censorship tools, then uses them on the Freedom Convoy but not Hamas supporters. But what you see is what you get.

When I say Canada is not a serious nation I don’t mean the situation isn’t serious. Nations that neglect security on frivolous grounds get just as conquered as those who are intentionally betrayed. And the Liberals’ climate policies have done major harm to the economy and national unity while their snarling sunny ways helped poison our politics. But if our government is silly, we must face it.

Especially since we don’t have to choose rogues or fools. We could elect politicians who are serious without being sinister. If not, we’ll all have to make sacrifices, except Liberal MPs in vulnerable ridings and their jet-setting boss.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
John Robson
John Robson
Author
John Robson is a documentary filmmaker, National Post columnist, contributing editor to the Dorchester Review, and executive director of the Climate Discussion Nexus. His most recent documentary is “The Environment: A True Story.”
Related Topics