John Robson: Is It 1938 Out There?

Today’s Hamas sympathizers echo the 1930s ‘Bund’ movement in North America.
John Robson: Is It 1938 Out There?
Pro-Palestinian protesters march in a rally in Toronto on Jan. 14, 2024. The Canadian Press/Arlyn McAdorey
John Robson
Updated:
0:00
Commentary
Since the Hamas invasion of Israel to massacre Jews on Oct. 7, 2023, there has been an eruption of public Jew-hatred in Canada. The most recent example occurred this past weekend, at the start of Passover, when “pro-Palestinian” demonstrations took place on Parliament Hill during which an officer was spat upon, in Edmonton blocking a bridge, while in Montreal, just ahead of Passover, “demonstrators” vandalized Concordia University’s Azrieli Institute of Israel Studies.

Despite the flimsy excuses of apologists that such displays and protests are “merely” anti-Zionism, they have led numerous commentators to draw explicit, horrified, baffled comparisons to the 1930s that, while legitimate to a point, actually fail to express the far greater seriousness of the situation today.

The similarities are real. In the 1930s, the principal pro-Nazi group in Canada was the feeble Deutscher Bund Canada or “Bund.” This German-Canadian “movement” couched its Hitlerian tendencies in vague ethnic terms as an apolitical organization to “unify Germans from coast to coast” against “materialism, rationalism, urbanism, communism, and Judaism” and failed risibly to attract members or influence policy.

As in the 1930s, Canadians manifesting hostility toward Jews today are often linked to foreign governments openly hostile to, even to varying degrees actually at war with, us and our way of life. And as in the 1930s, official Canada has reacted feebly to both.

Back then, the government of Mackenzie King famously failed to respond to the rise of Naziism. It neither welcomed Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany nor supported international efforts to oppose Hitler, while King’s own views of Der Führer are cringeworthy.

It might seem that things are better today, when even progressives deplore King’s failure to grant admission to the MS St. Louis in 1939, and no Canadian leader would dream of speaking aloud about Jews as he did. But things aren’t better, they’re worse, because immediately after the Oct. 7 atrocities, when it was already clear that mass torture and rape were integral to the Hamas attack (the jihadis live-streamed it), many supposedly responsible figures in Canada praised Palestinian “resistance by any means necessary.”

No reputable Canadian said such a thing of Hitler’s invasion of Poland. But in 2023, “mainstream” parties claimed a “genocide in Gaza” and sported emblems of Islamist terror in Parliament. Whereas in the leadup to the Second World War, despite widespread “polite” anti-Semitism that excluded Jews from schools, clubs, and professions, there was almost literally no support for Hitler’s geopolitical or ethnic aims and certainly nobody waved a Swastika in the Commons.

As for actual Nazis, Canada didn’t even have a National Socialist party until a farcical 1965 entry. In the 1930s, the ersatz “National Unity Party of Canada” (NUPC) tried to occupy that niche but at its “high point,” loosely speaking, attracted roughly 2,500 people to a 1938 rally in Toronto. (By contrast, Stalinism did enjoy a troubling degree of support from intellectuals, trade unions, and the public, hence the corresponding organizational robustness of communist parties here.)

In the 1930s, Nazis couldn’t get anywhere even by pretending to be a glee club. But today’s Hamasniks seem to command a great deal of sympathy from across the progressive left, including academia, and without any effort to hide their Islamist sympathies and violent hostility to Jews can turn out hundreds of people in cities across Canada to disrupt classes and block roads week after week.

It’s not all bad news. The Canadian public are generally appalled by these enemies within, as in the 1930s. Most respondents who’d heard of pro-Hamas university “encampments” told pollsters in May of 2024 that they supported dismantling them, especially “if protestors voice antisemitic views or propagate any form of hate speech.” But on the minus side, politicians—like Toronto mayor Olivia Chow and her police service—tolerate and even abet these loathsome protests while making occasional unconvincing verbal displays of sympathy for Jews.

Indeed, a troubling parallel with the 1930s is that, in the West, the best seem to lack all conviction and the worst are filled with passionate intensity, again paving the way for aggression and genocide. With the added horror that our government funds radical Hamas-friendly extremism—and seems determined to expand the rapidly growing diaspora of anti-Semites, through aggressive immigration policy that abuses calls to vet newcomers for Canadian values like anti-racism as itself racist or “Islamophobic.” Nobody was prating about “Naziphobia” in 1938.

Thus, comparisons between anti-Semitism prior to World War II and today drastically understate our problem. The Bund and Nazi-sympathizing NUPC, despite a few headlines and unconvincing camouflage, made very few inroads with Canadians. But today’s overtly pro-Hamas agitators enjoy widespread support from academics, public-sector unions, and politicians, support rooted in a shared rejection of Western values that must itself be recognized and dealt with if Canada’s anti-Semitism problem is to be fixed.

If not, beware. Because one final terrifying parallel between the 1930s and today is the infamous refusal to believe people who openly said they were bent on conquest, in large part so they could exterminate Jews. And being so blind a second time is worse. Much worse.

John Robson is a senior fellow at the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy, an adjunct professor at Augustine College, an author, historian, columnist, and documentary filmmaker.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
John Robson
John Robson
Author
John Robson is a documentary filmmaker, National Post columnist, contributing editor to the Dorchester Review, and executive director of the Climate Discussion Nexus. His most recent documentary is “The Environment: A True Story.”