Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law. The rule of law means, among other things, that everyone is equal before the law, regardless of the citizen’s religious beliefs, political opinions, or moral convictions. Sadly, in some cases there appears to be a double standard and political bias when it comes to dealing with disruptive protesters.
It is a Criminal Code offence to cause a disturbance. It is also a crime to obstruct, interrupt, or interfere with the lawful use, enjoyment, or operation of property. The police may have had reasonable grounds to charge Pastor Reimer with these offences, but he was acquitted of these charges in September 2024. The Crown is appealing the acquittal. However, in a different trial before a different judge, Pastor Reimer was convicted of criminally harassing Saddletowne Public Library service delivery manager Shannon Slater.
The punishment imposed on Pastor Reimer was severe, including 12 months of house arrest (with no right to host company) followed by two years of probation. He has also spent over 50 days in jail over the past two years, including time spent in respect of charges of which he was acquitted. The harassment in question did not involve prolonged harassment or threats of violence, and was based on one social media post of his peaceful interaction with Ms. Slater, who later received a message from a third party saying only “shame on you.”
Pastor Reimer’s defence counsel Andrew MacKenzie provided the court with multiple examples of people found guilty of criminal harassment who were actually stalking and threatening people: their punishment was a short period of probation, not house arrest.
If the charges, conviction, and penalty in R. v. Reimer are fair and just, then I am left to wonder why I have never seen or heard of police laying criminal charges against ideologically motivated protesters who disrupt or shut down pro-life events, and other events hosting conservative, libertarian, or otherwise unorthodox speakers.
In defending free speech on campus at Canadian universities over the past 20 years, I’ve lost count of the number of times that pro-life events and displays were physically obstructed by counter-protesters. The physical blockading of pro-life displays, and the shutting down of meetings with screaming and other disruptive behaviour, sometimes resulted in universities seeking to ban pro-life expression on campus; the university punished the victims rather than punishing the perpetrators. In other cases, these peaceful students were required to pay exorbitant security fees to deal with the bad—and in some cases criminal—behaviour of those who sought to silence the students’ message. Nobody was charged or arrested for causing a disturbance, or for interfering with the lawful enjoyment of property.
Under the rule of law, the cause that one protests for or against should be completely irrelevant. Criminal charges should be laid only in regard to a person’s behaviour, without considering that person’s moral, religious, or political motivation. By making political decisions that favour woke politics while arresting and prosecuting the politically incorrect, police and Crown prosecutors are undermining public respect for the administration of justice. A return to the rule of law is long overdue.