For years, the mainstream media has complained loudly about smaller news outlets they consider “fringe,” who have been stealing their audience by offering what they have snidely referred to as “alternative facts.”
After years of declining viewers and subscriptions, the fake news media is really starting to worry about the effects of fake news on American society.
The gist of the discussion was a circular agreement among the panelists: The real problem, when it comes to disinformation, is that Trump and his supporters refer to the carefully packaged political-propaganda-disguised-as-news-coverage as “fake news,” which, in the minds of the panelists, demonstrates how Russian-directed agitprop is undermining the sacred American institution of a free press.
Well, excuse me.
“Much talk among media types about ‘disinformation.’ As in: How do we avoid being conduits for disinformation? One small suggestion: Conduct a rigorous self-examination of how you were taken in by the Steele dossier and the role its allegations played in coverage from 2017-2019.”
Over the past three years, two competing narratives formed in the U.S. news media:
The news outlets that pushed the Russiagate narrative naturally ended up in the opposite camp from the ones that published news stories and columns in support of Spygate.
The publication of special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report in April 2019 completely exposed and was hugely embarrassing for media outlets that deliberately facilitated or allowed themselves to be fooled into publishing fake news based on bad information fed to them by anonymous leakers.
If these media are so very concerned about the spread of disinformation in the United States, and they want to do something constructive to cut down on it, here’s something they could do:
They could go look in a mirror and think about all the lies they published about people such as President Donald Trump, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), and many, many others over the past few years.