Inflation: State-Sponsored Terrorism

Photobank.kiev.ua/Shutterstock

This talk was delivered on Sept. 3, 2022, at the Ron Paul Institute conference in northern Virginia.

I. Introduction

Remember the quaint old days of 2019? We were told the U.S. economy was in great shape. Inflation was low, jobs were plentiful, gross domestic product was growing. And frankly, if COVID hadn’t come along, there’s a pretty good chance Donald Trump would have been reelected.

At an event in 2019, my friend and economist Dr. Bob Murphy said something very interesting about the political schism in this country.

He said, “If you think America is divided now, what would things look like if the economy was terrible, if we had another crash like 2008?”

Well, we might not have to imagine such a scenario much longer.

If you think Americans are divided today and are at each other’s throats—metaphorically but, more and more, literally—imagine if they were cold and hungry!

Imagine if we had to live through something like Weimar, Germany; Argentina in the 1980s; Zimbabwe in the 2000s; or Venezuela and Turkey today? What would our political and social divisions look like then?

Ladies and gentlemen, we live under the tyranny of inflationism. It terrorizes us, either softly or loudly. I suspect it will get a lot louder soon.

As the late Bill Peterson explained: “Inflationism, in today’s terms, is deficit-spending, deliberate credit expansion on a national scale, a public policy fallacy of monumental proportions, of creating too much money that chases too few goods. It rests on the ‘money illusion,’ a widespread confusion between in­come as a flow of money and income as a flow of goods and services—a confusion between ‘money’ and wealth.”

Inflationism is both a fiscal and monetary regime, but its consequences go far beyond economics. It has profound social, moral, and even civilizational effects. And understanding how it terrorizes us is the task today.

II. Understanding Inflationism

I’ll ask you to consider three things.

First, inflation is a policy. We should make them own it. Inflation is not something beyond our control that comes along periodically like the weather. Our monetary and fiscal regimes actually set out to create it and consider it a good thing. Let’s not forget—both Trump and Biden signed off on COVID stimulus bills that, combined, injected roughly $7 trillion directly into the economy—even as actual goods and services were dramatically reduced due to lockdowns.

Deflation was the natural order of things in response to a crisis, a [expletive] crisis in my view, but still a crisis. So, of course, Uncle Sam actively attempted to undo the natural desire to spend less and hold more cash during a time of uncertainty.

This $7 trillion was created on the fiscal side of things. It wasn’t new Fed bank reserves exchanged for commercial bank assets as a roundabout monetization of Treasury debt, as we saw with quantitative easing. This was direct stimulus from the Treasury via Congress as express fiscal policy. Free money.

This money went straight into the accounts of individuals (stimulus checks), state and local governments, millions of small businesses (PPP [Paycheck Protection Program] loans), the airline industry, and untold earmarks. This was actual cash, and it’s being spent. So any economist who tells you today’s inflation is somehow a surprise is either charitably misinformed or gaslighting.

This is a policy. Inflation is engineered. The difference between supposedly desirable 2 percent CPI [Consumer Price Index] and very bad, awful, no good 9 percent CPI is only one of degree. The same mindset produces both. But the inflationists insist a little bit of virus is good for us, like a vaccine. ... So an express policy of some inflation is the mechanism to forestall too much inflation. This is a curious position.

Second, inflation is nothing less than sanctioned state terror, and we ought to treat it as such. It’s criminal. It makes us live in fear. Inflation is not just an economic issue, but, in fact, produces deep cultural and social sickness in any society it touches. It makes business planning and entrepreneurship—which rely on profit and loss calculations using money prices—far more difficult and risky, which means we get less of both. How do you measure money profits when the unit of measurement keeps falling in value? It erodes capital accumulation, the driver of greater productivity and material progress.

So inflation destroys both existing wealth and future wealth, which never comes into being and, thus, diminishes the world our children and grandchildren inhabit. And it makes us poor and vulnerable in our senior years.

After all, saving is for chumps. Current one-year CD [certificate of deposit] rates are below 3 percent, while inflation is at least 9 percent. So you’re losing 6 points just by standing still! By the way, the last time official CPI approached double digits, in the early ‘80s, a one-year CD earned 15 percent. I’d like to hear Jerome Powell explain that.

By the way, ever since Alan Greenspan began this great experiment of four decades of lower and lower interest rates, guess who hasn’t benefited? Poor people and subprime borrowers, who still pay well over 20 percent for their car loans and credit cards.

But here’s an unspoken truth: Inflation also makes us worse people. It degrades us morally. It almost forces us to choose current consumption over thrift. Economists call this “high time preference,” preferring material things today at the expense of saving or investing. It makes us live for the present at the expense of the future, the opposite of what all healthy societies do.

Capital accumulation over time, the result of profit, saving, and investing, is how we all got here today—a world with almost unimaginable material wealth all around us. Inflationism reverses this.

So this very human impulse, to save for a rainy day and perhaps leave something for your children, is upended. Inflationism is inescapably an antihuman policy.

Third, hyperinflation can happen here. It may not happen, and it may not happen soon. But it might well happen. And even steady 10 percent inflation means prices double roughly every seven years. We can pretend the laws of economics don’t apply to the world’s leading superpower, or that the world’s reserve currency is safe from the problems experienced by lesser countries. And it’s certainly true our reserve currency status insulates us and makes the world need dollars.

Governments and industry mostly use U.S. dollars to buy oil from OPEC countries, hence the term “petrodollar.” It’s certainly true that governments, central banks, large multinational companies, worldwide investment funds, sovereign wealth funds, and pension funds all hold plenty of U.S. dollars—and, thus, in a perverse way share our interest in maintaining King Dollar. It’s true we don’t have easy historical examples of a world reserve currency, such as gold, suffering a rapid devaluation across the world (even the Spanish silver devaluation of the 1500s and 1600s wasn’t necessarily caused by a glut in circulating currency).

So we’re in uncharted territory, especially given the fiscal and monetary excesses of the past 25 years and especially the past two years. But this only means the potential contagion is greater and more dangerous. The whole world can be sickened at once.

III. A Story: ‘When Money Dies’

But as most of you surely know by now, we don’t turn the ship around or win hearts and minds simply with logic and facts and airtight arguments. We need stories, or narratives, in today’s awful media parlance, to gain influence. We need emotional reactions, so I will suggest a story with plenty of pathos to shake people out of their complacency and sound the warning.

That story is “When Money Dies,” Adam Fergusson’s brilliant cautionary account of hyperinflation in Weimar-era Germany. It’s the story Americans desperately need to hear today.

Fergusson’s book should be assigned to central bankers STAT (we wonder how many of them know of it). It’s not a book about economic policy per se—it’s a story, a historical account of folly and hubris on the part of German politicians and bureaucrats. It’s the story of a disaster created by humans who imagined they could overcome markets by monetary fiat. It’s a reminder that war and inflation are inextricably linked, that war finance leads nations to economic disaster and sets the stage for authoritarian bellicosity.

We think Versailles and reparations created the conditions for Hitler’s rise, but without the Reichbank’s earlier suspension of its one-third gold reserve requirement in 1914, it seems unlikely Germany would have become a dominant European military power. Without inflationism, Hitler might have been a footnote.

Most of all, “When Money Dies” is a tale of privation and degradation. Not only for Germans, but also for Austrians and Hungarians grappling with their own political upheavals and currency crises in the 1910s and ‘20s.

In a particularly poignant chapter, Fergusson describes the travails of a Viennese widow named Anna Eisenmenger. A friend of mine, @popeofcapitalism on Twitter, sent me her diary from Amazon.

The story starts with her comfortable life as the wife of a doctor, and mother to a wonderful daughter and three sons. They are talented and cultured and musical and upper-middle class. They even socialize with Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, the Duchess of Hohenberg.

But in May 1914, their happy life is shattered. Ferdinand is assassinated at Sarajevo, and war breaks out. Wars cost money, and the gold standard wisely adopted by Austria-Hungary in 1892 is almost immediately seen as an impediment. So the government predictably begins to issue war bonds in huge numbers, and the central bank fires up the printing presses. This results in a sixteenfold increase in prices just during the war years.

But the human effects are catastrophic, even apart from the war itself.

Frau Eisenmenger is luckier than most Viennese women. She owns small investments which produce modest income—fixed in kronen. Her banker quietly urges her to immediately exchange any funds for Swiss francs. She demurs, as dealing in foreign currency has been made illegal. But soon she realizes he was right. There’s probably a lesson here for all of us!

As the war unfolds, she’s forced into black markets and pawning assets to procure food for her war-damaged children. Her currency and Austrian bonds become almost worthless. She exchanges her husband’s gold watch for potatoes and coal. The downward spiral of her life, marked by hunger and hoarding anything with real value, happens so quickly she barely has time to adjust.

But her misery doesn’t stop with the end of the war. On the contrary, the Saint-Germain Treaty in 1919 gives way to a period of hyperinflation: The money supply increases from 12 billion to 30 billion kronen in 1920, and to about 147 billion kronen at the end of 1921 (does this sound like America 2020, by the way?). By August 1922, consumer prices are 14,000 times greater than before the start of the war eight years earlier.

In just a few short years, she endures countless tragedies, all made worse by privation, cold, and hunger. Her husband dies. Her daughter contracts tuberculosis and dies, leaving Frau Eisenmenger to take care of her infant daughter and young son. One son goes missing in the war, one son is blinded, and her son-in-law becomes crippled following the loss of both legs. Food and coal are rationed, so her apartment is a miserable hovel—and she’s forced to dodge searches by the “Food Police” looking for illegal hoarding. Ultimately, she’s shot in the lung by her own communist son, Karl, in a fit of rage.

There’s a haunting and historically accurate silent film about conditions in Vienna during this era called “The Joyless Street,” starring a young Greta Garbo. Her character sees everything deteriorate around her; even her father beats her with his cane for returning home without food.

Once friendly neighbors become suspicious of each other’s stores of bread and cheese, while prostitution becomes rampant. Angry people jostle in line, waiting for the butcher to open, and when he does, only the most attractive women receive the scraps of meat available that day.

Fistfights become common. Starving children beg for food in front of restaurants and cafes like stray dogs. Everything familiar and beautiful in society becomes degraded and cheapened seemingly overnight.

Like a Stephen King horror movie, something very familiar changes into a strange and menacing place. Your neighborhood takes on a different light. People you thought you knew become malevolent strangers. Scapegoating, blame, and snitching become commonplace.

Is this beginning to sound familiar, especially after Biden’s sick speech earlier this month?

So, next time one of these sociopaths in our political class wants to spend a few trillion more to pay for a Green New Deal or a war with China or free college, remember Frau Eisenmenger’s story.

IV. The Lessons for Today

How do we apply this grim historical lesson from the Weimar period to the United States today? How do we tell this story?

First, we explain inflationism in human terms, to personalize it and debamboozle it. Make monetary policy vital and immediate, not boring and dry and technocratic. Again, there are enormous moral and civilization components to monetary policy.

Inflation not only harms our economy, it makes us worse people: profligate, shortsighted, lazy, and unconcerned with future generations. Professor Guido Hülsmann literally wrote the book on this. It’s called “The Ethics of Money Production.” This is maybe the greatest untold story in America today: the story of not only how the Fed fundamentally shifted our economy from one of production to consumption, but what it did to us as people.

Don’t let them hide behind complex Fed speak the simple reality: Monetary policy is nothing less than criminal theft from future generations, from savers, and from the poorest Americans who are furthest from the money spigot. The idea that reasonably intelligent laypeople can’t understand monetary policy, that it’s too important and complex for anyone but experts, is nonsense. We should expose it.

Second, ridicule the absurd idea that “policy” can make us richer. More goods and services, produced more and more efficiently, thanks to capital investment—and thereby creating price deflation—make us richer. That’s the only way. Not legislative or monetary edicts.

So we should attack any notion of “public policy” and especially “monetary policy.” Inflationism creates a fake economy, a “make-believe” economy, as Axios recently put it.

A fake economy depends on enormous levels of ongoing fiscal and monetary intervention. We call this “financialization,” but we all have a sense that our prosperity is borrowed. We all feel it. Capital markets are degraded: A lot of money moves around without creating any value for anyone. Companies don’t necessarily make profits or pay dividends; all that matters to shareholders is selling their stock for capital gains. It always requires a new Ponzi buyer.

But we know intuitively this isn’t right: Consider a restaurant or dry cleaner that operated without profit for years in the hope of selling for a gain years or decades later. Only the distorted incentives created by inflationism make this mindset possible. So down with “policy”—what we need is sound money!

Finally, let’s not fear being accused of hyperbole or alarmism. Let me ask you this: What happens if we’re wrong, and what happens if they’re wrong? What they’re doing, meaning central bankers and national treasuries, is unprecedented. Fake money is infinite; real resources are not.

Hyperinflation may not be around the corner or even years away; no one can predict such a thing. But at some point, the U.S. economy must create real organic growth, if we hope to maintain living standards and avoid an ugly inflationary reality.

No amount of monetary or fiscal engineering can take the place of capital accumulation and higher productivity. More money and credit are no substitute for more, better, and cheaper goods and services. Political money can’t work, and we should never be afraid to attack it root and branch. We need private money, the only money immune from the inescapable political incentive to vote for things now and pay for them later. If this is radical, so be it.

History shows us how money dies. Yes, it can happen here. Only a fool thinks otherwise.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.