European authorities are investigating an alleged “cash for influence” scheme in which as many as 15 current and former members of the European Parliament (MEPs) took bribes from Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications company.
The case, initiated by Belgian intelligence, indicates that greater vigilance is needed in Europe and elsewhere against malign foreign influence operations.
On March 13, more than 100 police reportedly raided 21 offices in Belgium, France, and Portugal, including offices of lobbyists working for Huawei in Brussels, the capital of the European Union. Federal police detained several individuals for questioning. One arrest was made in France. Two European parliamentary assistants are under suspicion and had their offices sealed by court order. An office in Portugal was raided on suspicion of receiving wire transfers meant for MEPs.
On March 14, the European Parliament banned Huawei lobbyists from its premises.
The investigation is of alleged corruption, forgery, and criminal organization, as well as possible money laundering. Illegal gifts were allegedly received as far back as 2021 in Brussels in exchange for taking political positions. The gifts allegedly included food, travel, soccer tickets, and conference expenses worth more than 150 euros per MEP, the limit after which such gifts must be reported. It apparently costs little to buy an MEP.
The company’s reach and resources are huge, with a market capitalization of $178 billion. Huawei uses some of that money to engage in networking at a high level of European politics, including with former European Council President Charles Michel.
But do Europeans really want to sacrifice their security for cheaper telecoms?
At another event in Davos in January, a reporter lobbed softball questions to Huawei’s Europe CEO Kenneth Fredriksen. He said that Huawei would like to be “an alternative to Europe” in multiple ways. Huawei would continue “what we have been doing for the last two decades, contributing to Europe’s digitalization and I think also help Europe to basically prepare for AI, become AI ready.”
Fredriksen noted that AI is more than an application layer. He said, “You need to have the infrastructure from end to end in order to be able to realize the full potential of AI.”
Michel made points to a reporter that would be welcome in Beijing, including an implicit threat of retaliation against the U.S. “trade war.” He voiced support for the World Trade Organization and “multilateralism.” The CCP has used the ideology of liberal trade and its easy access to multilateral forms of international governance to exponentially increase its global influence since the West’s diplomatic opening to China in the early 1970s.
From the subnational to the federal levels, CCP-linked organizations are energetically influencing European and broader international politics. At least as much energy should be put into resisting legal and illegal forms of CCP infiltration. The European raids against Huawei lobbyists on March 13 were a good start. But much more remains to be done.