The brazenness of the deceit we are witnessing every single day at this point is not only mind-boggling; it is dangerous.
The emergence of yet another variant of the COVID-19 virus is raising the specter of masks, social distancing, and lockdowns again. Apparently, we are supposed to forget what has only recently been officially admitted: that masks do not prevent the spread of the disease, and that lockdowns did serious damage to the economy and to children’s education without any offsetting benefit.
Statements that the drugs ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine could not be used to treat COVID-19 were also untrue.
Where are the consequences for those responsible for these false statements and the incalculable harm caused by them?
The public health deceit is dwarfed by that taking place in the political realm generally.
Politics is a veritable petri dish for breeding lies, but this has been taking to shockingly dangerous levels when it comes to former President Donald Trump.
The claim that Trump “colluded” with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election was a lie. Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid for “information” that the FBI knew from the get-go was false. The FBI then lied to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) court to get illegal warrants to spy on the Trump campaign and later, his administration.
These specious accusations spawned the two-plus yearlong Mueller investigation into Trump’s campaign activities that cost taxpayers more than $30 million and found nothing. The report released this spring by Special Counsel John Durham concluded that the FBI had no evidentiary justification even to start its “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation of Trump, that it was a political hatchet job launched by Clinton, and that the FBI’s treatment of Clinton (accused of mishandling classified information) and Trump was “markedly different.”
Hobbling and smearing the Trump administration wasn’t enough. So Democrats decided to impeach Trump for a phone call he made to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In that call, Trump asked about an earlier decision to fire Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who had been investigating corruption in the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, where then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter had a cushy job paying him tens of thousands of dollars a month.
When Hunter Biden’s laptop—with all its sordid content—came into the public eye just before the November 2020 election, social media and former intelligence officials claimed it was “Russian disinformation” and censored the content. That was a lie—and one that likely had an impact on the election.
Where are the consequences?
Now they’re indicting Trump for questioning the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, and for hiring lawyers to make his arguments. (They’re also indicting his lawyers.) It’s inscrutable that Trump’s objections to election results are criminal offenses, but Al Gore’s in 2000, Hillary Clinton’s in 2016, and Stacey Abrams’ in 2018 weren’t. In fact, Washington Times reporter Susan Ferrechio wrote last week that Democrats “have attempted to block every Republican presidential winner since 2000.”
Trump is being charged with conspiracy to do something that not only isn’t illegal, it’s constitutionally protected speech. The partisans behind these sham charges know full well that they will never get convictions that withstand appeals. Their real goal is to cripple Trump and deceive the public into believing that Trump is guilty of conduct that disqualifies him from public office.
And they will not be pleasant.