When I was in my teens (a lifetime ago), I read a lot of fantasy. J.R.R. Tolkien. G.R.R. Martin. C.S. Lewis. Terry Brooks.
Herbert set a new standard for sci-fi, building entire worlds and cultures that integrated complex ideas and events from our own world, touching on a variety of themes—politics, religion, ecology, and power.
“Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.”
It was a passage that always stuck with me, and I wasn’t alone.
The quote—part of the Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear and a mantra recited by Atreides during a critical test early in the first novel—is probably the most popular quote from the Dune books, and one routinely shared during the pandemic.
Recently, I came across a Frank Herbert quote I hadn’t heard before, one far less known.
“All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.”
It’s a penetrating thought, and when I first read the words, I wondered if they were too good to be true. Most of us at one time or another have seen a quote online attributed to Morgan Freeman, George Washington, Robin Williams, or some other famous or influential person only to find after a two-minute investigation the quote is pure fiction or falsely attributed.
In that chapter, Hayek describes at length how centralized systems elevate individuals to lead them, and concludes that those possessing the strongest desire to organize economic and social life to their plan tend to have the fewest scruples about exercising power over others.
“To undertake the direction of the economic life of people with widely divergent ideals and values,” Hayek wrote, “the best intentions cannot prevent one from being forced to act in a way which to some of those affected must appear highly immoral.”
“The Road to Serfdom” was published in 1944, when Stalin and Hitler were ascendant and the world was immersed in totalitarianism. Yet Hayek did not see the brutality of these systems as “accidental by-products,” but the natural progression of nation-states in which checks on power are destroyed or abandoned.
“Just as the democratic statesman who sets out to plan economic life will soon be confronted with the alternative of either assuming dictatorial powers or abandoning his plans,” he wrote, “so the totalitarian dictator would soon have to choose between disregard of ordinary morals and failure.”
This is why “the unscrupulous and uninhibited” are most likely to rise in such systems, Hayek concluded.
I have no idea if Herbert ever read Hayek, but his observation that governments have a powerful tendency to attract “pathological personalities” sounds remarkably close to Hayek’s idea that “the worst” get on top.