Americans probably owe our independence to foreigners. After all, the British employed Hessians to fight on their side in the Revolutionary War. These German troops didn’t really have skin in the game. They were paid regardless of whether they fought well or were captured in their barracks. And so, many were captured in their barracks.
When it comes to military questions, patriotism matters. So does reliability. By that logic, the European company Airbus should never be in the running for any U.S. defense contracts because it lacks both traits.
As the U.S. Air Force considers adopting a multirole tanker transport based on Airbus’s A330 jetliner, the sanctity of U.S. national security is a concern. Awarding Airbus U.S. defense contracts could put our national security at risk, as Airbus has alarming ties to communist China and its governmental officials, and is actively working with state-owned companies such as the Aviation Industry Corp. of China (AVIC).
The facts show that Airbus has colluded with Chinese government officials. According to the Department of Justice, between 2013 and 2015, Airbus engaged a business partner in China to bribe Chinese government officials in connection with the approval of certain agreements associated with the purchase and sale of Airbus aircraft to state-owned and state-controlled Chinese airlines.
Between 2011 and 2016, Airbus also “filed numerous applications for the export of defense articles and defense services to foreign armed forces.” As part of its applications, Airbus was required to provide “information related to political contributions, fees, or commissions paid in connection with the sale of defense articles or defense services.”
David P. Burns, principal deputy assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s National Security Division, said that “international corruption involving sensitive U.S. defense technology presents a particularly dangerous combination. Today’s announcement demonstrates the Department’s continuing commitment to ensuring that those who violate our export control laws are held to account.”
Airbus agreed to pay an almost $4 billion settlement to the United States, UK, and France to avoid prosecution in a case involving other countries as well as China.
AVIC is working to improve China’s defense capabilities in air and space and could obtain classified information or technologies critical to national security through its partnerships.
Additionally, Airbus shares data with controversial Chinese companies such as Alibaba Group.
However, the Chinese regime and police are known to work with Alibaba, using its data and surveillance footage to identify persons of interest, which could include dissidents as well as the oppressed Tibetans and Uyghurs. Alibaba doesn’t routinely disclose its activities with the Chinese regime, undermining the security and confidentiality of Airbus’s work with the U.S. government.
BSI has provided more than 100 million square kilometers of imagery over 20 years. The company has been awarded contracts for nationwide projects in the natural resources, transportation, maritime safety, water resource, and agriculture sectors.
Is this a company the United States can trust as a partner in building defense platforms? With these disturbing connections to China, Airbus appears to be a mercenary company in the tradition of the German Hessian troops. It can’t have U.S. national defense in mind when it bribes government officials and schemes to win contracts.