The range of negative reactions to the new law is telling.
One of the more surprising objections was raised by a Chinese émigré who works as an economist at the Mercatus Center, George Mason University’s pro-free-market think tank.
Zhong need not worry about Americans hating those who flee communist tyranny. A small minority of Americans may resent immigrants whom they perceive to represent a threat to their jobs, but the overwhelming majority of Americans are more than happy to welcome refugees escaping from tyrannies.
The more typical objections to the new Florida law will come from the anti-American left. They'll point out America’s faults while glossing over communist atrocities.
A student at the college where I taught gave a lesson about the evils of communism at the high school where she did her student teaching. After the class, her supervising teacher glared at her and huffily stated that after she was gone, he would teach the students about the good things that communist governments had done. Huh? What good things? A “good side of communism” lecture would have to be the shortest lecture (well, the shortest truthful lecture) in academic history. The appalling fact that some teachers teach that communism has made some positive contributions to human society shows why the Florida law is so needed.
Let’s gloss over the counterfactual reference to “other western superpowers.” What’s most fascinating about this bizarre statement is the sudden concern on the left for the “impressionable.” Leftists were loudly opposed to Florida’s recent law banning instruction about gender identity, even though the little tykes covered by that law (those in grades kindergarten through three) are certainly more impressionable than the “kids” who are old enough to be reading about communism. Yet, it seems that leftists would like to ban any historically factual education about communism, a political virus that poses an existential threat to the realization of each person’s unique individuality.
The assertion that “there have never been any ‘true’ communist countries” is a favorite leftist myth. Well, it’s technically true, I suppose, in the sense that there has never been a historical example of a communist regime imposing a Marxist plan on society and successfully creating a just and affluent workers’ paradise followed by the ruling communist party withering away, its historical mission having been accomplished. But it isn’t correct to assert that “true” communism hasn’t been tried.
Lenin imposed complete communism for the first few years that he was in power in Russia. The problem for him and his subject peoples was that communism in practice was so unworkable that Lenin jettisoned “pure communism” and replaced it with his New Economic Policy in 1921. The policy permitted limited free market activity, not because Lenin liked economic freedom, but because it was the only way to keep the Russian people from starving to death and strangling his “communist paradise” in its cradle.
It’s unfortunate that Florida had to enact a law directing schools to acquaint students with the evilness of communism. One would think that American teachers, having lived their whole lives free from political oppression and the impoverishment caused by central economic planning, would, as a matter of course, teach the crucial and profound differences between the American belief in individual rights and communism. Alas, many teachers and schools have gotten off track; in fact, many of them have adopted leftist curriculums.
Since the left has weaponized education, pushback and countermeasures have become necessary. In that context, the Florida law mandating some modest observances and lessons about the evils of communism is a welcome development.
